2022 PLP 2124 (CLC)
FAIQUE ALI JAGIRANI — Petitioner Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Parliaments Secretary for Law and Justice, Islamabad and 4 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2022 PLP 2124 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | FAIQUE ALI JAGIRANI — Petitioner Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Parliaments Secretary for Law and Justice, Islamabad and 4 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2022 PLP 2124 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2022 PLP 2124 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2022 PLP 2124 (CLC) (FAIQUE ALI JAGIRANI — Petitioner Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Parliaments Secretary for Law and Justice, Islamabad and 4 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalieeque Ahmed, DAG for Respondent-Federation.
Headnotes / Summary
Arts. 199, 223 & 218
Constitutional petition
Bar against double membership
Scope
Petitioner sought directions to the Chief Elections Commissioner of Pakistan to take appropriate steps in order to restrict all electoral candidates from contesting election on multiple seats
Contention of petitioner was that it constituted violation of Art.218(3) of the Constitution and also placed an unnecessary burden on the national exchequer as the cost of individual contesting on multiple seats resulted in a significant waste of national resources
Directions sought were contrary to the constitutional mandate in terms of Art.223 of the Constitution as it specifically contemplated multiple candidature, hence it was manifest that from a constitutional standpoint a person was not prevented from being a candidate for two or more seats at the same time
Constitutional petition was dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
YOUSUF ALI SAYEED, J.
The Petitioner had invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution on the cusp of the general elections of 2018, seeking that directions be issued to the Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan (Respondent No.2) to take appropriate steps in order to restrict all electoral candidates, especially the Respondents Nos.3 to 5, being the Chairpersons/Party Leaders of the three main political Parties, namely the Pakistan Peoples Party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and Pakistan Muslim League (N) respectively, from contesting that election on multiple seats and rather to confine their candidacy to one seat of their choice. The case of the Petitioner is that some candidates, especially the Respondents Nos.3 to 5, make it a point to contest on multiple seats so as to increase the appeal of their parties in different regions of the country, and that this constitutes a violation of Article 218(3) of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, whereby the Election Commissioner of Pakistan (Respondent No.2) is under obligation to ensure an honest, fair and just elections with adequate safeguard against corrupt practices. Per the Petitioner, multiple candidature also places an unnecessary burden on the national exchequer as the cost of one individual contesting on multiple seats results in a significant waste of national resources. Having considered the arguments advanced by the Petitioner, who appeared in person, it merits consideration at the outset that the subject of the instant Petition, being the General Elections 2018, has long since past. Be that as it may, even if the proposition advanced is considered in a more general sense, it is evident that the directions sought are contrary to the constitutional mandate in terms of Article 223, which stipulates as follows:- "
223. Bar against double membership.
(1) No person shall, at the same time, be a member of,-- (a) both Houses; or (b) a House and a Provincial Assembly; or (c) the Assemblies of two or more Provinces; or (d) a House or a Provincial Assembly in respect of more than one seat. (2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent a person from being a candidate for two or more seats at the same time, whether in the same body or in different bodies, but if he is elected to more than one seat he shall, within a period of thirty days after the declaration of the result for the last such seat, resign all but one of his seats, and if he does not so resign, all the seats to which he has been elected shall become vacant at the expiration of the said period of thirty days except the seat to which he has been elected last or, if he has been elected to more than one seat on the same day, the seat for election to which his nomination was filed last. Explanation:- In this clause, "body" means either House or a Provincial Assembly. (3) A person to whom clause (2) applies shall not take a seat in either House or the Provincial Assembly to which he has been elected until he has resigned all but one of his seats. (4) Subject to clause (2), if a member of either House or of a Provincial Assembly becomes a candidate for a second seat which, in accordance with clause (1), he may not hold concurrently with his first seat, then his first seat shall become vacant as soon as he is elected to the second seat." From a reading of the said Article, it is apparent that it specifically contemplates multiple candidature, hence it is manifest that from a constitutional standpoint a person is not prevented from being a candidate for two or more seats at the same time. That being so, it is apparent that the Petition is devoid of merit, and stands dismissed accordingly. SA/F-7/Sindh Petition dismissed.