PLD 2001

P L D 2001 Lahore 385 (PLP)

MUHAMMAD AJMAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAWALPINDI and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.2217 of 2000, decided on 17th May, 2001.
Honorable Judges
Ali Nawaz Chowhan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 2001 Lahore 385 (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Ali Nawaz Chowhan, J
Parties MUHAMMAD AJMAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAWALPINDI and others‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law University of the Punjab Act (IX of 1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 2001 Lahore 385 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: University of the Punjab Act (IX of 1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 2001 Lahore 385 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Ali Nawaz Chowhan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 2001 Lahore 385 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AJMAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAWALPINDI and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

University of the Punjab Act (IX of 1973)‑‑

Representation

  • Ch. Afrasiab Khan for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑Ss. 2(ii) & 5‑‑‑Calendar of the University of the Punjab, 1990 Chap. X Regln.8(1)‑‑‑Prospectus of the Government Medical Colleges in the Punjab Ss. 3 & 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Misconduct by student of a Government Medical College affiliated with the Punjab University‑‑‑Punishment of 2 years rustication of the student for misconduct as prescribed by Ss.3 & 4 of. the Prospectus of the Government Medical Colleges in the Punjab (issued by the Provincial Government) was awarded by the Principal of the College ‑‑‑ValidityMedical College although under the Health Department of the Provincial Government was nonetheless an affiliated College of the Punjab University and was governed by Calendar of the University and its regulations and, therefore, Government of the Province could not by taking support of the rule which authorised the Provincial Government to arrange for the medical education, act even in such matters which would fall under the jurisdiction of the Punjab University as envisaged by the Punjab University Act, 1973‑‑ Government Medical College, therefore, had to follow the regulations with respect to discipline meant for the Punjab University and its affiliated colleges and the punishment awarded to the student of rustication for 2 years was not in harmony with the regulations of the Punjab University as punishment prescribed in the prospectus issued by the Provincial Government was in clash with the regulations by the Punjab University as prescribed in its Calendar‑‑‑Student having completed one year period of rustication as prescribed in the University Calendar, could join the academic classes‑‑‑Principal of the College if felt that residence of the said student in the hostel of the college would create indiscipline, he could be refused the facility of the hostel and could be kept under surveillance against any anticipated act of indiscipline on his part. Malik Anwaar‑ul‑Haq for the University.

Judgment & Decree

(vi) The Students may be expelled from the college for a maximum period of up to five years. (vii) The student may be forcibly migrated to another medical college in Punjab.

4. Regulations relating to expulsion:‑‑ (i) Expulsion whenever imposed on a college student shall mean the loss of five calendar years and will mean his/her being debarred from the university examination during the period of his/her expulsion. (ii) A student expelled from a college shall not be re‑admitted before the expiry of the period of his expulsion. (iii) Cases of expulsion shall be reported to the university by the Principal concerned for registration and notification."

3. Admittedly, the Rawalpindi Medical College is an affiliated college of the Punjab University as defined by section 2(ii) of the University of the Punjab Act, 1973 (No. 9 of 1973).

4. The Act in its Chapter VI deals with the affiliation of educational institution to the University and the requirements for such an affiliation. According to section 5 of the Act, the University exercises all the powers conferred under the Act, within the territorial limits of the Punjab and in respect of institutions over which the University has control or had control previously when West Pakistan (University of the Punjab) Ordinance, 1961 was operational. The Calendar of the University in its Chapter X reflects the regulations relating to discipline, welfare and code of honour of the students of the University and of the affiliated Colleges. Regulation 8 relates to rustication, expulsion and withdrawal. Section 8(i) specifically deals with rustication and reads as follows:‑‑ "

8. Regulations Relating to Rustication Expulsion and Withdrawal. ‑‑(i) Rustication, whenever imposed on a College/University Student, shall always mean the loss of one academic year in so far as his Examinations are concerned. The period of absence from the College/University Teaching Department/Institute will, however, depend upon the, time of the year when the penalty is imposed. The student under rustication may at the discretion of the Principal of the College/Chairman of a Department/Director of the Institute be permitted to rejoin the class in the same College/Department/Institute in the beginning of the next academic year; (ii)

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

(viii)

5. It, therefore, appears that the punishments of 5 years rustication is in clash with the aforementioned regulation of the Punjab University.

6. When it was argued that the Calendar of the Punjab University was not applicable to the Rawalpindi Medical College, a notice was sent to the Registrar of the Punjab University who is represented before this Court. According to the learned counsel for the Punjab University, Rawalpindi Medical College being an affiliated college was under the ambit of jurisdiction of the Punjab University and its Calendar.

7. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Rawalpindi Medical College was asked to explain how can an affiliated college of the Punjab University has its own independent rules pertaining to discipline and how can those prescribe an excessive punishment when such a punishment has not been prescribed by the Calendar of the University itself. The learned counsel has referred to the rule of the Health Department, Government of the Punjab in this connection and stated that the Health Department while acting under the Punjab Rules of Business as envisaged under section 139 of the Constitution is assigned the duty of medical education including medical schools and colleges and institution for dentistry. That the prospectus of the Medical Colleges have been made by the Health Department in view of this assignment. But the question is whether the role of the Health Department Government of the Punjab was merely for arranging the medical education or it extended beyond that and it overtook the functions which are prescribed by the aforementioned regulations of the Punjab University? The answer is that a Medical College although under the Health Department for administrative purposes is nonetheless an affiliated college of the Punjab University and is governed by its Calendar and its regulations and, therefore the Government of the Punjab cannot by taking support of the rule which authorises it to arrange for the medical education, act even in such matters B which would fall under the jurisdiction of th6 Punjab University as envisaged by the Punjab University Act, 1973. This Court, therefore, feels that the Rawalpindi Medical College has to follow the regulations with respect to discipline meant for the Punjab University and its affiliated colleges and the punishment awarded to the petitioner of rustication for 2 years was not in harmony with the regulation.

8. After having completed one year period of rustication, the petitioner now can join the academic classes. However, in view of his past conduct, if the Principal of the College does feel that his residence in a hostel of the Rawalpindi Medical College would create indiscipline, he may be refused the C facility of the hostel and may also be kept under surveillance against any anticipated act of indiscipline on his part which may call for a disciplinary action against him once more. The writ petition, consequently, is disposed of in these terms. No order as to costs. M.B.A./M‑580/L Order accordingly