1991 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus YOUNUS BUTT, S.H.O., SATGARH, DISTRICT OKARA and 5 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus YOUNUS BUTT, S.H.O., SATGARH, DISTRICT OKARA and 5 others — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus YOUNUS BUTT, S.H.O., SATGARH, DISTRICT OKARA and 5 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Amjad Pervaiz for Petitioner.
- M. Arshad Khan, Addl. A.G. with Ch. M. Iqbal Vehniwal for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 5(2)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199
Investigation of case-- Case was registered against accused
Investigation was not being conducted-- Complaint was also made to Inspector-General of Police to that effect-- Inspector-General -f Police was directed to dispose of complaint on merits in accordance with law.
Judgment & Decree
Writ Petition No.1135 of 1991, decided on 8th April, 1991.
S. 5(2)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199
Investigation of case-- Case was registered against accused
Investigation was not being conducted-- Complaint was also made to Inspector-General of Police to that effect-- Inspector-General -f Police was directed to dispose of complaint on merits in accordance with law. Malik Amjad Pervaiz for Petitioner. M. Arshad Khan, Addl. A.G. with Ch. M. Iqbal Vehniwal for Respondents. A criminal case under sections 342/161 and 109 read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 has already been registered against the accused with Police Station Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara. The grievance is that no further action has been taken inasmuch as the case has not been investigated so far. It is argued that the accused have not been arrested as yet. A complaint was also sent by the petitioner to the Inspector-General of Police, Lahore requesting him to take appropriate action in the matter according to law. Learned Law Officer has no objection if a direction is issued to the I.G. Police for disposal of the complaint, Annexure `B' according to law. In the circumstances the Inspector-General of Police shall dispose of the complaint of the petitioner, referred to above on its merits according to law as early as possible. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of: SA./M-2791/L Order accordingly.