1991 PLP 1664 (SCMR)
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ARIF GORAYA — Respondent
| Citation | 1991 PLP 1664 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | S. Usman Ali Shah and Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, JJ |
| Parties | FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ARIF GORAYA — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 1664 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 1664 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: S. Usman Ali Shah and Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 1664 (SCMR) (FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ARIF GORAYA — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- MA. Siddiqui, Deputy Attorney-General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate- on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 13th February, 1990.
- MA. Siddiqui, Deputy Attorney‑General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate- on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 6-6-1989, passed in Appeal No.216(L) of 1984).
Art. 212(3)
Court after hearing petitioners came to the conclusion that case of petitioners was arguable which needed further consideration
No circumstances conducive for fresh enquiry existed and it was not so necessary because whatever was to be enquired was already placed on record
Leave to appeal was granted and implementation of order of Tribunal was suspended till final disposal of appeal.
Judgment & Decree
S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.‑‑‑This is a petition for special leave to appeal and is directed against the order of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 6‑6‑1989, whereby, appeal of the respondent against his removal from service, was accepted. Briefly the facts are that the respondent was working as Auditor in TA. 1 Section of the Accountant‑General of Pakistan, Revenue, Islamabad, where he was involved in a case of fraud of Rs.7,53,150, on the basis of which he was sent on forced leave which was extended till 21‑2‑1977 when the order of his suspension from service was passed on the said date by the A.G.P.R. The respondent was also served with a show‑cause notice and the reply submitted by him to this effect was not found satisfactory. Consequently, a preliminary enquiry was constituted against him to enquire into the fraud case allegedly committed by him. He was also given an opportunity to be heard in person in his defence. The Enquiry Officer, after recording evidence found the respondent guilty of the charge and his case was referred to the F.I.A. who recommended the case of the respondent to be proceeded departmentally. On the basis of the advice of the F.I.A., thereafter, a fresh show -cause notice was served on the respondent to which he submitted his explanation on 12‑4‑1983. He was given full opportunity to make his personal submissions in support of his defence. The respondent was found guilty of the charges and vide Office order dated 29‑2‑1984, he was dismissed from service. Departmental appeal of the respondent before the Auditor‑General of Pakistan was rejected and his subsequent appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal was accepted, vide impugned order dated 6‑6‑1989. The respondent was ordered to be reinstated in service with immediate effect, however, the petitioners were given a choice to initiate fresh disciplinary proceedings against the respondent on the same charge, in accordance with law. Hence this petition before us for leave to appeal. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, we have come to the conclusion that the case of the petitioners is arguable which needs further consideration. There were no circumstances conducive for the fresh enquiry and it was not so necessary because whatever was to be enquired was already placed on the record. Leave to appeal is granted and the implementation of the impugned order of the Tribunal is to be suspended till the final disposal of this appeal. Appeal is to be made ready on the present record with permission to parties to file additional documents. H.B.T./F‑170/S Leave granted.