2010 PLP 3279(1) (YLR)
Nawabzada Syed SHAMS HAIDER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 3279(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Waqar Hassan Mir, J |
| Parties | Nawabzada Syed SHAMS HAIDER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 3279(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 3279(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Waqar Hassan Mir, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 3279(1) (YLR) (Nawabzada Syed SHAMS HAIDER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/324/148/149
Qatl-e-amd and attempt to commit qatl-e-amd
Contention of accused was that at the time of occurrence, he was conducting a meeting with his party workers at his house and he had been involved in the case just to scandalize the matter and injure his reputation as well as political career
Accused was admitted to protective bail for the period of one week, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
WAQAR HASSAN MIR, J.
Submits that at the relevant time of occurrence, the petitioner was conducting a meeting with his party workers at his house and he has been involved in this case just to scandalize the matter and injure his reputation as well as political carrier; that the F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner under sections 302, 324, 148, 149, P.P.C. but the role ascribed to him is proverbial Lalkara; that allegedly the offence is made out in the jurisdiction of Rawalpindi Bench of this Court but the petitioner having apprehension of arrest by police, has approached for protective bail at principle seat.
2. The petitioner is admitted to protective bail for the period of one week i.e. till 30-7-2010 subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. After expiry of said period of seven days, this order shall automatically be elapsed. Disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./S-169/L Bail granted.