1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
WALAYAT KHAN Versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Ihsan-ul-Haq Chaudhry and Malik Muhammad Qayyum, JJ |
| Parties | WALAYAT KHAN Versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Ihsan-ul-Haq Chaudhry and Malik Muhammad Qayyum, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (WALAYAT KHAN Versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. M. Tufail for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art.199
Transfer orders got cancelled by civil servant by using political influence
Subsequently, cancellation of the order was withdrawn resulting in restoration of the transfer orders
Locus standi to challenge such order
Civil servant had failed to show any violation of law and rules
Civil servant having himself used political influence to get his transfer order set aside, was now estopped to complain when that order had been recalled
Civil servant could not be allowed to have two standards; one for himself and the other for others
Civil servant's conduct disentitled him to any relief in Constitutional jurisdiction
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Writ Petition No. 6362 of 1990, decided on 8th September, 1990.
Art.199
Transfer orders got cancelled by civil servant by using political influence
Subsequently, cancellation of the order was withdrawn resulting in restoration of the transfer orders
Locus standi to challenge such order
Civil servant had failed to show any violation of law and rules
Civil servant having himself used political influence to get his transfer order set aside, was now estopped to complain when that order had been recalled
Civil servant could not be allowed to have two standards; one for himself and the other for others
Civil servant's conduct disentitled him to any relief in Constitutional jurisdiction
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Ch. M. Tufail for Petitioner.