1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MASIH-UL-ZAMAN Versus DEPUTY COMMANDANT, PUNJAB CONSTABULARY, FAROOQABAD
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | MASIH-UL-ZAMAN Versus DEPUTY COMMANDANT, PUNJAB CONSTABULARY, FAROOQABAD |
| Primary Law | Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MASIH-UL-ZAMAN Versus DEPUTY COMMANDANT, PUNJAB CONSTABULARY, FAROOQABAD). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ilyas for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor
- Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 3rd December 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
Rr. 3, 4 & 6
Civil servant who was standing guard at Assembly Hall, was dismissed from service after hearing him on ground of absence from duty without permission or intimation for 34 days-- Civil servant who claimed to be seriously ill during that period, admittedly never bothered to send a formal application for leave supported by medical certificate
Civil servant who belonged to a disciplined force like Police, having failed to follow rules of discipline and charge against him that he left his post without proper authorization having been established beyond any doubt, he was rightly dismissed by Authority after conducting departmental proceedings against him in accordance with prescribed procedure.
Judgment & Decree
and others Appeal No. 100 of 1990, decided on 10th January, 1991.
Rr. 3, 4 & 6
Civil servant who was standing guard at Assembly Hall, was dismissed from service after hearing him on ground of absence from duty without permission or intimation for 34 days-- Civil servant who claimed to be seriously ill during that period, admittedly never bothered to send a formal application for leave supported by medical certificate
Civil servant who belonged to a disciplined force like Police, having failed to follow rules of discipline and charge against him that he left his post without proper authorization having been established beyond any doubt, he was rightly dismissed by Authority after conducting departmental proceedings against him in accordance with prescribed procedure. Ch. Muhammad Ilyas for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 3rd December 1990.