MLD 2008

2008 PLP 866 (MLD)

MORRISON BHATTI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2008-March-27
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 PLP 866 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties MORRISON BHATTI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 866 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 866 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 866 (MLD) (MORRISON BHATTI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.334

Bail, refusal of

Accused had, allegedly after giving blows whit an iron bar on the head and other parts of the body of his wife cut off the tip of her nose with a pair of scissors

Matter had been reported to the police on the same day by the brother of the victim

Section 334, P.P.C. had been incorrectly applied in the F.I.R.

Cutting of nose even a part of it would clearly cause permanent disfigurement, which according to S.335, P.P.C. fell within the purview of "Itlaf-i-Udw" and the offence was punishable under S.336, P.P.C., inter alia, with imprisonment upto ten years, and the same was correctly applicable in the case

Violence committed by the accused was a worst type of domestic violence and there was increasing tendency of such violence in the society

Most of the witnesses including the victim had already been examined and the trial was near completion

Bail was refused to accused in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

ALI SAIN DINO MELTO, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned State counsel. The latter has opposed bail. According to the prosecution, on 6-6-2006, at about 8-30 hours, applicant Morrison Bhatti, subjected his wife Shaleen Rossana Oliver to domestic violence in his house situated in Drig Road, Cant Bazar, Karachi. She was working as Manager Nursing, in Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi. On the day of incident, she proceeded for duty and as soon as she came out from her house the applicant pushed her back into the house, bolted the door from inside, and started giving her blows with an iron bar on head and other parts of the body, as a result of which she fell down and started bleeding. He then took a pair of scissors and cut off tip of her nose. She was rushed to Liaquat National Hospital and after giving her first aid she was referred to Jinnah Post-Graduate Medical Centre, Karachi. The matter was reported to police by her brother Salman William on the same day at 1710 hours. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that out of the six wounds suffered by the victim on her eye, head and nose, the injuries at serials Nos. 2 and 4 have been declared as "Shajjah-e-Mediha", while final opinion regarding injury on the left eye mentioned at serial No.1 of the certificate has not been given as yet. Surprisingly, the nose injury has been declared as "Shajjah-e-Khafifah", supposedly for the reason that there was no fracture of any bone. This seems to be due to lack of legal knowledge. In the F.I.R. also section 334 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (P.P.C.) has been incorrectly applied. The correct section applicable in the case will be 336, P.P.C. Cutting of nose, even a part of it, clearly causes permanent disfigurement which according to section 335, P.P.C. comes within the purview of "Itlaf-i-Udw" and the offence is punishable under section 336, P.P.C., inter alia, with imprisonment upto 10 years. The Court while considering the question of bail in the case like the present one, cannot ignore the increasing tendency of domestic violence in our society. The violence committed by the applicant is also a worst type of domestic violence. Moreover, most of the witnesses, including the victim, have already been examined and the case is near completion. For all these reasons, the case is not fit for the grant of bail. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. N.H.Q./M-18/K Bail refused.