2003 PLP 3104 (YLR)
SHARIQ IMRAN KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2003 PLP 3104 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Roshan Essani and S. Ali Aslam Jafri, JJ |
| Parties | SHARIQ IMRAN KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 3104 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 3104 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Roshan Essani and S. Ali Aslam Jafri, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 3104 (YLR) (SHARIQ IMRAN KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑‑S.2‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 199‑‑‑Consitutional petition‑‑‑Placing a citizen on exit control list‑‑‑Furnishing of security to ensure return to Pakistan‑‑ Petitioner's name was placed on Exit Control List and he was ready to furnish surety or security as desired by the Authorities to ensure his return to Pakistan and to appear before the Authorities as and when required on a notice through his counsel ten days prior to the date of hearing ‑‑‑Validity‑‑ High Court accepted the offer and directed the petitioner to furnish solvent security‑‑‑High Court further' directed the petitioner to execute undertaking in writing to appear before the Authorities on a notice to him through his counsel ten days prior to the date of hearing‑‑ Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
- Munir A. Malik, Zaiul Haq Mukhdoom and Azhar Ali Khan for Petitioner.
- Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui, D.A.‑G, for Respondent No. 1.
- Agha Faqir Muhammad for Respondent No.2.
- On 23rd December, 2002 statement in writing signed by Tahir Mahmood, Additional Registrar of Companies, Company Registration Office Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Karachi and the learned counsel for respondent No.2 has been filed which is taken on record and reproduced as below:‑‑
- For respondent No.2
- Advocate for the respondent No.2.
Headnotes / Summary
Saleem Akhtar v. Federation of Pakistan and another PLD 1999 Kar. 177; Baber Khan Ghori and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1999 Kar. 402; Wajid Shamsul Hassan v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 1997 Lah. 617 and Ms. Naheed Khan v. Government of Pakistan and another PLD 1997 Kar. 513 ref.
Judgment & Decree
On 23rd December, 2002 statement in writing signed by Tahir Mahmood, Additional Registrar of Companies, Company Registration Office Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Karachi and the learned counsel for respondent No.2 has been filed which is taken on record and reproduced as below:‑‑ "Statement on behalf of the respondent No.2 (SECP). The petitioner be directed to appear before the Authority (SECP) if and when required by the Authority (SECP) on a notice to the petitioner through his counsel ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, subject to solvent security of Rs.1,000,000 (Rupees One Million only) to be given to the High Court to the satisfaction of the Nazir of the High Court. (Sd.) Tahir Mahmood, Additional Registrar of Companies. Company Registration Office, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Karachi. For respondent No.2 Additional Registrar of Companies, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. (Sd.) Advocate for the respondent No.2. Karachi Dated: December 23rd, 2002." Without dilating upon the merits of the case, we are of the opinion that in view of the offer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the statement filed on behalf of respondent No.2 in response to that offer the very purpose of filing of this petition stands served and the ends of justice would meet if this petition is disposed of on the basis of the above referred statement of respondent No.2. It is, therefore, ordered that in case the petitioner intends to travel abroad, he shall have to furnish solvent security in the sum of Rs.10,00,000 (Rupees One Million Only) to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court and execute an undertaking in writing to appear before the Authority (SECP) if and when required by the authority (SECP) on a notice to the petitioner through his counsel ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing. Petition stands disposed of accordingly alongwith listed application, with no order as to costs. M.H./S‑305/K Order accordingly.