2004 PLP 121 (YLR)
SHER MUHAMMAD and 3 others‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PLP 121 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Azizullah M. Memon, J |
| Parties | SHER MUHAMMAD and 3 others‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 121 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 121 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Azizullah M. Memon, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 121 (YLR) (SHER MUHAMMAD and 3 others‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mr. Anwar H. Ansari, Advocate for the applicants makes statement at the bar that this bail application as far applicants Nos. 1 Sher Muhammad and No.2 Ameen Muhammad is not pressed by him and the same, for the said two applicants/accused, is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302/337‑A(i)/337‑F(ii)/147/148‑‑‑ Bail grant of‑‑‑Out of four accused persons, bail application of two accused was not pressed and bail application to the extent of said two accused was dismissed as withdrawn‑‑ Remaining two accused were alleged with general allegation of having inflicted hatchet and Lathi blows on the person of deceased and injured person‑‑‑No specific role had been attributed to said two accused in F.I.R. and question in that behalf was yet to be determined by evidence during trial of case‑‑‑Said two accused were admitted to bail, in circumstances. 1980 SCMR 784 and 1997 SCMR 251 ref. Anwar H. Ansari for Applicants. Muhammad Azeem Panhwar for the State.
Judgment & Decree
1980 SCMR 784 and 1997 SCMR 251 ref. Anwar H. Ansari for Applicants. Muhammad Azeem Panhwar for the State. Mr. Anwar H. Ansari, Advocate for the applicants makes statement at the bar that this bail application as far applicants Nos. 1 Sher Muhammad and No.2 Ameen Muhammad is not pressed by him and the same, for the said two applicants/accused, is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. For applicants/accused Madad Ali and Younis, learned counsel has read out the relevant portion of the contents of the F.I.R., which was lodged by complainant Haji Mehal, wherein the said applicants viz. Madad Ali and Younis are alleged with the general allegation of having had inflicted hatchets and Lathi blows on the person of deceased Muhammad Saleem and injured Haji Mohib, and that they are not saddled with any specific allegation as to only one injury sustained by the said deceased as well as the injuries caused to the said injured. Learned counsel for the said two applicants has cited 1980 SCMR 784 wherein the applicants of the said case were admitted to bail by Honourable Supreme Court with the observation that it was yet to be determined as to at whose hands the fatal injury was caused to the deceased of the said case; learned counsel further cited 1997 SCMR 251 wherein also the bail was granted to the applicants of the said case by Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan on the basis of identical facts. Learned counsel appearing for the State also supports the arguments of learned counsel for applicants Madad Ali and Younis to the effect that no specific role has been attributed to the said two applicants in the F.I.R. and that the question to that effect is yet to be determined by means of record of the evidence during the trial of the case. Accordingly, applicants Madad Ali and Younis are hereby admitted to bail each in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 (two lacs) with P.R. bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S‑326/K Bail granted.