2003 PLP 389 (CLC)
M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Cabinet Division, Islamabad and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2003 PLP 389 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, J |
| Parties | M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Cabinet Division, Islamabad and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 389 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 389 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 389 (CLC) (M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Cabinet Division, Islamabad and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Arts. 41, 51, 91 & 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑General election‑‑‑Prescribing minimum educational qualification for voter and for President and Prime Minister‑‑‑Petitioner had sought two directions: Firstly that Government should be directed to prescribe Matriculation as minimum education qualification for a voter in general election and secondly a minimum qualification not less than a Ph.D., Barrister‑at‑Law or LL.M. for office of President and Prime Minister‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Right to vote is a fundamental right recognized in all established democracies‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan had envisaged a democratic and Federal Republic and Art.51 thereof had prescribed qualification of voter‑‑‑Attempt to prescribe electoral. qualification for a voter or for Head of State and Government was based on a presumption that only literates could make right kind of choices and that they were more honest, but that presumption was belied by historical experience‑‑‑Democracy is a form of Government which was of the people, by the people and for the people‑‑‑Said system of governance was based on faith in the collective wisdom of the people‑‑‑Voters through their elected parliamentarians express what is their interest, what ails the Society and how they would like to resolve the issues‑‑‑In present age of electronic and print media one need not necessarily require any educational qualification to understand the common problems‑‑In a country where only about 35 % of the population could read or write, any attempt to prescribe matriculation as a minimum educational qualification for a voter would tantamount to disfranchise a great majority of the people which would not be in accordance with the spirit of Constitution‑‑‑To prescribe educational qualification for President and Prime Minister of the, kind which had been prayed for by petitioner would limit choice of electoral college and would restrict the offices only to a privileged few which was antithesis of what democracy stood for. M.D. Tahir Petitioner (in person).
Judgment & Decree
M.D. Tahir Petitioner (in person). Petitioner is a senior Advocate of this Court. Through this petition he has sought two directions, firstly, that the Government should be directed to prescribe Matriculation as minimum educational qualification for the voter in the coming General Elections and, secondly, if Graduation has been prescribed as minimum qualification for the Members of the Provincial and National Assemblies and the Senate a minimum qualification not less than a Ph.D. Barrister‑at -Law or LL.M. he prescribed for the Offices of the President and Prime Minister.
2. In support of this petition learned counsel/petitioner submitted that this country had faced political instability, massive corruption and lack of economic development primarily because a great majority of voters are illiterate and they elect persons as Head of State and Head of the Government who did not have the requisite academic qualification to handle the multi‑dimensional problems of a State in the modern world.
3. The right to vote is a fundamental right recognized in all established democracies. The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan envisages a democratic Islamic and Federal Republic. Article 51 of the Constitution mandates that every citizen of Pakistan, if he is not less than eighteen years of age, whose name appears on the electoral role and has not been declared by a competent Court to be of unsound mind, has the right to vote, to elect his representative. The attempt to prescribe electoral qualification for a voter or for the Head of the State and the Government is based on a presumption that only literates can make right kind of choices and that they are more honest. However, this presumption is belied by the historical experience. Countries like Philippines, Malaysia, Argentina, Sri Lanka and Peru have had their share of political instability notwithstanding the fact that they have one of the highest literacy rates in the world. Across the frontier if we look at India, the State of Tamil Nadoo has highest literacy rate in India but the electorate elected Jey Lallita as Chief Minister, a lady who was thrice convicted on charges of corruption. Many Prime Ministers had resigned in Japan in the last 10/15 years on charges of corruption although again it is a country which can boast of one of the highest literacy rates.
4. There is an age‑old adage that Democracy is a form of Government which is of the people by the people and for the people. This system of governance is based on the faith in the collective wisdom of the people. The voters through the parliamentarians they elect express what is their interest, what ails the society and how they would like to resolve the issues. In this age of electronic and print media one does not necessarily require any educational qualification to understand the common problems. The wearer knows where the shoe pinches. In a country where only about 35 % of the population can read or write any attempt to prescribe I matriculation as a minimum educational qualification for a voter would tantamount to disfranchise a great majority of the people which would not be in accord with the spirit of the Constitution. Similarly, to prescribe educational qualification for the President and the Prime Minister of the kind which has been prayed in this petition would limit the choice of the electoral college and would restrict the offices only to a privileged few which is antithesis of what democracy stands for.
5. For what has been discussed above I see no merit in this petition which is hereby dismissed in limine. H.B.T./M‑1397/L Petition dismissed.