PCRLJ 1994

1994 P Cr (PLP)

ASHRAF GULZAR — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, FEDERAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1994-January-15
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties ASHRAF GULZAR — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, FEDERAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (ASHRAF GULZAR — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, FEDERAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Qazi Muhammad Saleem for Petitioner.
  • Farooq Bedar, Addl. A.-G. for Respondents.
  • According to learned counsel, a complaint vide Annexure "B" was lodged by the petitioner, Ashraf Gulzar, in the Police Station Bhatti Gate, Lahore, on 4-1-1994 disclosing that respondent Nos.3 and 4 trespassed into his house and deprived him of an attache-case alongwith a sum of Rs.5,000 and golden ornaments. It is stated by the learned counsel that the complaint Annexure "B" was not attended to by the Police Officer despite repeated requests. The allegations levelled in the complaint are serious indeed. A suggestion has, therefore, been made by the learned Additional Advocate- A General that the complaint may be forwarded to the S.S.P., Lahore for probe. In the circumstances, office shall send a copy of the complaint Annexure "B" alongwith this order to the S.S.P., Lahore. On receipt of the complaint, the Police Officer shall conduct an enquiry in presence of the petitioner and respondents Nos.3, 4 and 6. In case, he comes to the conclusion that some cognizable offence has been committed, he will proceed in the matter strictly in accordance with law. With this observation, this petition is disposed of.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Contention was that the complaint lodged by the petitioner against the accused for having trespassed into his house and having deprived him of his cash and gold ornaments was not attended to by the Police Officer despite repeated requests

Allegations levelled in the complaint being of serious nature, the complaint was forwarded to S.S.P. concerned with the direction to Police Officer to conduct an enquiry in the presence of the complainant and the accused and to proceed in the matter strictly in accordance with law if some cognizable offence was found to have been committed

Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

and 5 others

Respondents Writ Petition No.503 of 1994, decided on 15th January, 1994."

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Contention was that the complaint lodged by the petitioner against the accused for having trespassed into his house and having deprived him of his cash and gold ornaments was not attended to by the Police Officer despite repeated requests

Allegations levelled in the complaint being of serious nature, the complaint was forwarded to S.S.P. concerned with the direction to Police Officer to conduct an enquiry in the presence of the complainant and the accused and to proceed in the matter strictly in accordance with law if some cognizable offence was found to have been committed

Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Qazi Muhammad Saleem for Petitioner. Farooq Bedar, Addl. A.-G. for Respondents. According to learned counsel, a complaint vide Annexure "B" was lodged by the petitioner, Ashraf Gulzar, in the Police Station Bhatti Gate, Lahore, on 4-1-1994 disclosing that respondent Nos.3 and 4 trespassed into his house and deprived him of an attache-case alongwith a sum of Rs.5,000 and golden ornaments. It is stated by the learned counsel that the complaint Annexure "B" was not attended to by the Police Officer despite repeated requests. The allegations levelled in the complaint are serious indeed. A suggestion has, therefore, been made by the learned Additional Advocate- A General that the complaint may be forwarded to the S.S.P., Lahore for probe. In the circumstances, office shall send a copy of the complaint Annexure "B" alongwith this order to the S.S.P., Lahore. On receipt of the complaint, the Police Officer shall conduct an enquiry in presence of the petitioner and respondents Nos.3, 4 and

6. In case, he comes to the conclusion that some cognizable offence has been committed, he will proceed in the matter strictly in accordance with law. With this observation, this petition is disposed of. N.H.Q./A-626/L Order accordingly.