2002 PLP 1020 (YLR)
ANSAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 1020 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Muhammad Najam‑uz‑Zaman, J |
| Parties | ANSAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 1020 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 1020 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Najam‑uz‑Zaman, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 1020 (YLR) (ANSAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- A.D. Naseem for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497(2)‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324/334/34‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑First post arrest bail of the accused was dismissed on merits by the High Court‑‑‑Latest re investigation by the police found the accused innocent‑‑‑Accused, as per the F.I.R. had not caused any injury to any of the witnesses, nor any weapon of offence had been recovered from him ‑‑‑Challan of the case having already been submitted, accused was no more required for investigation‑‑‑Case of accused calling for further inquiry, he was granted bail. Nadeem Mehmood Mian for the Complainant. Saif Ullah Khalid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 497(2)‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324/334/34‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑First post arrest bail of the accused was dismissed on merits by the High Court‑‑‑Latest re investigation by the police found the accused innocent‑‑‑Accused, as per the F.I.R. had not caused any injury to any of the witnesses, nor any weapon of offence had been recovered from him ‑‑‑Challan of the case having already been submitted, accused was no more required for investigation‑‑‑Case of accused calling for further inquiry, he was granted bail. A.D. Naseem for Petitioner. Nadeem Mehmood Mian for the Complainant. Saif Ullah Khalid for the State. This is second application for grant of post‑arrest bail in case bearing F.I.R. No.261 of 2001 dated 29‑5‑2001 under sections 324/334/34, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Sadar Lala Musa District Gujrat on the ground that in the latest investigation conducted by Raza Awan, Inspector/S.H.O, petitioner has been found innocent.
2. Heard. Record perused.
3. First post‑arrest bail application of the petitioner i.e. Criminal Miscellaneous No.5646‑B of 2001 was dismissed by Mr. Justice Sh. Abdul Razaque (as then he was) vide order dated 31‑10‑2001 on merits but after the same matter was re investigated and in the latest investigation vide Zimni No.23 dated 22‑12‑2061 written by Raza Awan, Inspector, petitioner has been found innocent. It is also evident from the facts narrated in the F.I. R. that petitioner did not cause any injury to any of the witness nor during the investigation any weapon of offence was recovered from him. The challan in this case has already been submitted before the trial Court and the petitioner is no more required by the Investigating Agency for this purpose. In the light of latest position of the case during the investigation, prima facie, case of the petitioner calls for further falling within the purview of section 497(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. S.M.A.H./A‑511/L Bail granted.