MLD 2002

2002 PLP 1722 (MLD)

AHMED AZIM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No.D‑615 of 2001, decided on 27th September, 2001.
Honorable Judges
Syed Saeed Ashhad, C. J. and Mushir Alam, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2002 PLP 1722 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Syed Saeed Ashhad, C. J. and Mushir Alam, J
Parties AHMED AZIM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 1722 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 1722 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Syed Saeed Ashhad, C. J. and Mushir Alam, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 1722 (MLD) (AHMED AZIM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Zahir Marghoob for petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art.199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Educational institution‑‑‑Admission in Medical College‑‑‑Medical College where the petitioner/candidate was admitted, subsequently was closed by Government and taking sympathetic view of matter, students who were stranded due to the closure of the College were absorbed in different Medical Colleges, of the Province‑‑‑Petitioner who was absorbed in Government Medical College, claimed to be admitted in another Medical College, but his claim was denied and candidate moved Constitutional petition against the said refusal‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Petitioner having been absorbed on compassionate consideration after closing of the college, no vested right accrued to him to claim any preference in the nature of absorption in college of his choice‑‑‑No case had been made out for interference in Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court which was a discretionary in nature and was to be exercised with circumspection.

Judgment & Decree

The petitioner has sought a direction against the respondents to provide admission in IIIrd Year i.e. IInd Professional M.B.,B.S. in Dow or Sindh Medical Colleges. The facts forming background to claim of above relief are that the petitioner was admitted in M.B‑B.S. Course in Vohra Medical College, Karachi in the year 1991. He had completed two years (lst Professional) whereafter said College was closed by the Government and the students of the said College were stranded. However, Government taking sympathetic view of the matter ordered absorption of students to different Medical Colleges in accordance with the Policy laid down by the Government. Somehow name of the petitioner was left out from the list of such students who were to be absorbed. Petitioner agitated his grievance before the Provincial Ombudsman, who vide order dated 14‑4‑2000 directed the Government of Sindh to accommodate the petitioner in any Medical College in the Province of Sindh. Petitioner was accordingly offered admission in Chandka Medical College, Larkana vide Offer Letter dated 30‑8‑2000. Petitioner claimed that he was entitled to be admitted either in Dow or Sindh. Medical Colleges, at Karachi. He made several futile representations to the authorities concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the name of the petitioner was to be included amongst the students who were given admission in Dow or Sindh Medical Colleges and for no fault of the petitioner his name was left out and on the direction of Ombudsman petitioner was offered admission in Chandka Medical College, Larkana. It was contended by Mr. Zahid Marghoob that under the policy and prospectus petitioner was entitled to be admitted either in Dow Medical College or Sindh Medical College at Karachi. We have heard the arguments and perused the record. It is to be noted that the registration of Vohra Medical College, Karachi was cancelled and the College was closed by the Government of Sindh for a number of reasons putting the careers of 250 students at stake. The Government on compassionate ground allowed said students to be accommodated in other Medical Colleges in the Province of Sindh on Self‑Financing Scheme. The petitioner pursuant to direction of the Ombudsman was also offered such concession. It appears that instead of availing of such concession the petitioner approached various authorities for seeking his transfer to the Medical Colleges at Karachi. Such permissions were declined and transfer was not allowed by the competent authorities vide letter dated 31‑1‑2001 but the petitioner despite such refusal did not avail of the concession announced by the Government and made available under the orders of the Ombudsman but chose to file this petition. We are constrained to observe, that the petitioner and other students of defunct Vohra Medical College were absorbed in various colleges in Province of Sindh on compassionate consideration no vested rights accrued to the petitioner to claim any preference of absorption in college of his choice. As appears from the record the students of the defunct Vohra Medical College were to be absorbed in Medical Colleges in Province of Sindh on Self‑Financing Scheme under the Policy of the Government. No case has been made out for interference in writ jurisdiction, which is a discretionary relief and is to be exercised with circumspection. Petitioner's case was considered by the Ombudsman on its own merits and whatever relief that could be granted was granted by the Ombudsman. No case for the relief prayed for has been made out. We do not find any merit in this petition, same is dismissed in limine alongwith the listed application. H.B.T./A‑331/K????????? Petition dismissed.