MLD 1986

1986 PLP (1) (MLD)

MIR HASSAN and another‑‑Accused/Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Opponent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.824 and Miscellaneous Application No.882 of 1986, decided on 17th June, 1986. Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ ‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Bail before arrest‑‑Accused tried to approach Court of Sessions but was cordoned off by Police thus could not move bail‑ Co‑accused already granted bail before arrest‑‑Protective bail granted to accused.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J
Parties MIR HASSAN and another‑‑Accused/Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Opponent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP (1) (MLD) (MIR HASSAN and another‑‑Accused/Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Opponent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicant.

Judgment & Decree

THE STATE‑‑Opponent Criminal Bail Application No.824 and Miscellaneous Application No.882 of 1986, decided on 17th June, 1986. Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ ‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Bail before arrest‑‑Accused tried to approach Court of Sessions but was cordoned off by Police thus could not move bail‑ Co‑accused already granted bail before arrest‑‑Protective bail granted to accused. Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicant. This is an application for anticipatory bail. It is contended that applicants are respectable persons and they actually went to approach the Court of Sessions Hyderabad but the police had cordoned the Court, therefore, they could not move bail application. It is further argued that some co‑accused have already been granted bail before arrest. Without going into the merits of the case, I grant protective bail, to both the applicants on furnishing one surety in the sum of! Rs.50,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount each to the satisfaction oil the Nazir of this Court. This order will be valid upto 24‑6‑1986. It is l made clear that the learned Sessions Judge has discretion to decide bail application on merits and according to law and this interim order shall not come in his way. M.Y.H. Bail granted.