2002 PLP 1902 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHAN NIAZI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus UNITED BANK Ltd. through President and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2002 PLP 1902 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday and |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHAN NIAZI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus UNITED BANK Ltd. through President and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 1902 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 1902 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 1902 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHAN NIAZI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus UNITED BANK Ltd. through President and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Ghani, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑ on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 11th April, 2002.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from this Court's order, dated 27‑7‑2000 passed in Civil Petition No.595‑L of 1999). ‑‑‑‑O.XXVI‑‑‑Review of Supreme Court judgment‑‑‑Rehearing of case‑‑ Validity‑‑‑When no mistake apparent on the face of record had been pointed out in the judgment under review, rehearing of the case was not permissible in review jurisdiction.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑O.XXVI‑‑‑Review of Supreme Court judgment‑‑‑Rehearing of case‑‑ Validity‑‑‑When no mistake apparent on the face of record had been pointed out in the judgment under review, rehearing of the case was not permissible in review jurisdiction. M.A. Ghani, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑ on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 11th April, 2002. ORDER. MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.‑Review of judgment dated 27‑7‑2000 is sought on the ground that it has been held in the case of Messrs Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd. v. Muhammad Tahir Khan and others (2001 PLC (C.S.s, 591,) that in a case of charge of misconduct regular inquiry was mandatory.
2. This aspect of the case has been dealt with in the judgment under review and it has been held that keeping in view the nature of the charge against the petitioner i.e. that he did not join the duty at Quetta in spite of his transfer order passed by the competent Authority, no regular inquiry was necessary. Besides it was also held that no substantial question of law of public importance was involved in this case.
3. The petitioner wants rehearing of the case which is not permissible in review jurisdiction. No mistake apparent on the face of record has been pointed out in the judgment under review.
4. For the foregoing reasons, this petition has no merits which is accordingly dismissed. Q. M. H. /M. A. K./M‑411/S Petition dismissed.