1989SCMR320 (PLP)
AZAM RIAZ FAROOQI — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989SCMR320 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid lqbal, JJ |
| Parties | AZAM RIAZ FAROOQI — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR320 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR320 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid lqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR320 (PLP) (AZAM RIAZ FAROOQI — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 31st July, 1988.
- Mian Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Salahuddin, Advocate‑on‑Record fur Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 6-3-1982 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Writ Petition No. 4670 of 1978).
Ss. 19-A & 10--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)--Petition for leave to appeal--Leave to appeal granted, inter alia, to examine question whether S. 19-A of Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act was subject to control of its S. 10 and terms and conditions laid down from time to time in Schemes relevant in this case and other directives issued by Board of Revenue and other related questions. Mian Saeedur Rehman Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Salahuddin, Advocate-on-Record fur Petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑After hearing the learned counsel at some length, we consider it a fit case for grant of lave to appeal inter alia to examine the question: whether section 19‑A of the Colonization of Government Lands Act, is subject to the control of section 10 thereof and the terms and conditions laid down from time to time in the schemes relevant in this case and the other directive issued by the Board of Revenue; and other related questions. Order according. After hearing the learned counsel on a further point, grant of leave to appeal in this case is subject to the following two conditions: (i) that the petitioner shall implead Muslim Law heirs of Aslam Riaz Farooqi, the original allottee as petitioners/appellants within two month; and (ii) that in case of success of appeal, the benefit shall go to the said heirs. Security Rs. 5,
000. Stay to continue subject to giving half of the produce to the said heirs. The appeal shall he prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all necessary documents. M.Y.H./A‑326/S Leave granted.