PLD 1979

P L D 1979 Karachi 475 (PLP)

HUSSAIN BUX-Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRPUR AND 8 OTHERS

Jurisdiction / Court
S. 115 read with S. 107-Revision-District Judge hearing revision application tinder S. 115-Does not enjoy same power as enjoyed by an appellate Court under S. 107--Basis of exercise of jurisdiction under S. 115-Held, preconditional to existence of any of conditions specified in S. 115-Revisional Court allowing revision without adverting to any such condition and without justification converting suit under S. 9 into one under S. 8, Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-Such judgment held, without lawful authority and set aside-Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 8 & 9.-Revision (civil).
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. 208 of 1976, decided on 18th October 1978.
Honorable Judges
Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Ajmal Mian, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1979 Karachi 475 (PLP)
Forum / Court S. 115 read with S. 107-Revision-District Judge hearing revision application tinder S. 115-Does not enjoy same power as enjoyed by an appellate Court under S. 107--Basis of exercise of jurisdiction under S. 115-Held, preconditional to existence of any of conditions specified in S. 115-Revisional Court allowing revision without adverting to any such condition and without justification converting suit under S. 9 into one under S. 8, Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-Such judgment held, without lawful authority and set aside-Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 8 & 9.-Revision (civil).
Bench Members Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Ajmal Mian, JJ
Parties HUSSAIN BUX-Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRPUR AND 8 OTHERS
Primary Law Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Karachi 475 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Karachi 475 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the S. 115 read with S. 107-Revision-District Judge hearing revision application tinder S. 115-Does not enjoy same power as enjoyed by an appellate Court under S. 107--Basis of exercise of jurisdiction under S. 115-Held, preconditional to existence of any of conditions specified in S. 115-Revisional Court allowing revision without adverting to any such condition and without justification converting suit under S. 9 into one under S. 8, Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-Such judgment held, without lawful authority and set aside-Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 8 & 9.-Revision (civil). bench comprising: Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Ajmal Mian, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Karachi 475 (PLP) (HUSSAIN BUX-Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRPUR AND 8 OTHERS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Representation

  • S. H. RIM for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondent No. 1.
  • Date of hearing : llth October 1978.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 115 read with S. 107-Revision-District Judge hearing revision application tinder S. 115-Does not enjoy same power as enjoyed by an appellate Court under S. 107--Basis of exercise of jurisdiction under S. 115-Held, preconditional to existence of any of conditions specified in S. 115-Revisional Court allowing revision without adverting to any such condition and without justification converting suit under S. 9 into one under S. 8, Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)-Such judgment held, without lawful authority and set aside-Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 8 & 9.-[Revision (civil)]. Fazal Muhammad v. Muhammad Usman P L D 1970 Lah. 560 and Abdul Aziz v. Mst. Doulat Bibl and 3 others P L D 1973 Lah. 125 fool. Mst. Jalna and others v. Hussain and another P L D 1963 Kar. 531 and Abdul Jamil v. Haroon P L D 1969 Kar. 78 distinguished. Muharnmad Hussain Munir and others v. Sikandar and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref. Respondent No. 2 (absent). A. F. Memon for L. Rs. of Respondent No. 3.

Judgment & Decree

S. 115 read with S. 107‑Revision‑District Judge hearing revision application tinder S. 115‑Does not enjoy same power as enjoyed by an appellate Court under S. 107‑‑Basis of exercise of jurisdiction under S. 115‑Held, preconditional to existence of any of conditions specified in S. 115‑Revisional Court allowing revision without adverting to any such condition and without justification converting suit under S. 9 into one under S. 8, Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)‑Such judgment held, without lawful authority and set aside‑Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 8 & 9.‑[Revision (civil)]. Fazal Muhammad v. Muhammad Usman P L D 1970 Lah. 560 and Abdul Aziz v. Mst. Doulat Bibl and 3 others P L D 1973 Lah. 125 fool. Mst. Jalna and others v. Hussain and another P L D 1963 Kar. 531 and Abdul Jamil v. Haroon P L D 1969 Kar. 78 distinguished. Muharnmad Hussain Munir and others v. Sikandar and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref. S. H. RIM for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 (absent). A. F. Memon for L. Rs. of Respondent No. 3. Date of hearing : llth October 1978.