1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ZAFAR Versus THE DIRECTOR (W.P.) and others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Manzoor Hussain Sial and Tanvir Ahmed Khan, JJ |
| Parties | MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ZAFAR Versus THE DIRECTOR (W.P.) and others |
| Primary Law | (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Manzoor Hussain Sial and Tanvir Ahmed Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ZAFAR Versus THE DIRECTOR (W.P.) and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ejaz Anwar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Posting at a particular place is not a vested right of civil servant
Civil servant's transfer from one department to another department had got no prejudicial effect on his present emoluments
Plea of mala tides had simply been advanced without describing the same with particularity in accordance with law
Civil servant was not entitled to relief claimed by him for his posting at a particular place. Saeed Ahmad's case P L D 1974 SC 151 rel.
Art. 199
Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of
No jurisdictional defect or illegality worth interference in the impugned order was pointed out-- Petitioner would not be entitled to relief claimed by him through Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Civil service
Posting at a particular place is not a vested right of civil servant
Civil servant's transfer from one department to another department had got no prejudicial effect on his present emoluments
Plea of mala tides had simply been advanced without describing the same with particularity in accordance with law
Civil servant was not entitled to relief claimed by him for his posting at a particular place. Saeed Ahmad's case P L D 1974 SC 151 rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Art. 199
Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of
No jurisdictional defect or illegality worth interference in the impugned order was pointed out-- Petitioner would not be entitled to relief claimed by him through Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court. Ejaz Anwar for Petitioner.