1976 PLC 359 (PLP)
RAZA HUSSAIN SHAH Versus ISLAMABAD OMNI BUS SERVICE
| Citation | 1976 PLC 359 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | IInd Labour Court Punjab |
| Bench Members | Rai Abdur Razzaque Khan, Presiding Officer |
| Parties | RAZA HUSSAIN SHAH Versus ISLAMABAD OMNI BUS SERVICE |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations ordinance (XXIII of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLC 359 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLC 359 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the IInd Labour Court Punjab bench comprising: Rai Abdur Razzaque Khan, Presiding Officer.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLC 359 (PLP) (RAZA HUSSAIN SHAH Versus ISLAMABAD OMNI BUS SERVICE). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Raja Abdul Rashid for Appellant.
- Muhammad Afzal Siddiqui for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 25-A & 36-D-Limitation-Petition under S. 25-A dismissed by Junior Labour Court for having been filed much after expiry of prescribed limitation period-Interference, in appeal under S. s6-D, with order of Junior Labour Court, in circumstances, refused.
Judgment & Decree
This is an appeal preferred against an order dated 24-4-1975 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Junior Labour Court, Rawalpindi on a petition under section 25-A of the I. R. O. filed by the appellant, for his rein statement. His petition was dismissed. Hence this appeal.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and have gone through the record of the case as well as the impugned order,
3. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that appellant was termi nated from service. He filed petition under section 25-A b-fore the Junior Labour Court against his termination on 30-1-1975. His petition was dismissed on the ground that he should have filed a departmental appeal before coming to Junior Labour Court. He filed that petition accordingly. But it was dismissed on the point of limitation. Again he has come to Junior Labour Court and again his petition is time barred. Decision of departmental appeal was received by the appellant on 16-11-74 and he filed this petition before the Junior Labour Court on 6-3-1975 much beyond the time limit. His petition was therefore titre barred before the Junior Labour Court and it was rightly rejected on the point of limitation. His appeal therefore merits dismissal and it is hereby dismissed.