1986 PLP 2214 (MLD)
GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM KHAN and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 2214 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Zia Mahmood Mirza, J |
| Parties | GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM KHAN and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 2214 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 2214 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 2214 (MLD) (GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM KHAN and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Art.199‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑Station House Officer was allegedly harassing petitioner at instance of other three respondents‑‑Petitioner's grievance was directed mainly against a police officer‑‑Petition disposed of with direction to petitioner to approach concerned Superintendent of police who was directed to look into his grievance.
Judgment & Decree
Writ Petition No.2522 of 1986, decided on 21st June, 1986. ‑‑‑Art.199‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑Station House Officer was allegedly harassing petitioner at instance of other three respondents‑‑Petitioner's grievance was directed mainly against a police officer‑‑Petition disposed of with direction to petitioner to approach concerned Superintendent of police who was directed to look into his grievance. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner. Petitioner has moved this constitutional petition praying' that "the respondents may kindly be stopped to dispossess the petitioner from his house and also save from the high‑handedness of the respondents who has created a lot of harassment to the petitioner's family and respondent No. 4 may kindly be directed to stop, illegal proceeding and coercive measures adopted by him.
2. It is alleged in this petition that respondents Nos.1 to 3 had got a false case registered against the petitioner under section 379, P.P. C. vide F.I.R. No.103, dated 10‑5‑1985 which case on investigation was found false and was; therefore, cancelled. It is further alleged that respondents Nos.1 to 3 in connivance with respondent No.4, who is S.H.O. Kamalia, are harassing the petitioner and forcing him to sell 'his house located in Chak No. 407/GB. It is stated that the petitioner has already made all the payments to the respondents for the purchase of buffaloes and nothing is due from him. Precise grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.4, who is a police officer, is harassing the petitioner at the instance of respondents Nos.1 to 3.
3. As the petitioner's grievance is directed mainly against respondent No.4, who is a police officer, he may approach S.P. Toba Tek Singh, who shall look into his grievance and take appropriate action warranted in the facts and circumstances of the ease. With these observations this petition stands disposed of. H . A . K Order accordingly.