1989 PLP 1035 (SCMR)
GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through I.‑G.P. and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. TASLEEM Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1035 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, Ghulam Mujaddid and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through I.‑G.P. and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. TASLEEM Respondent |
| Primary Law | Police Rules, 1934 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1035 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Police Rules, 1934 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1035 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, Ghulam Mujaddid and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1035 (SCMR) (GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through I.‑G.P. and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. TASLEEM Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- J.D. Akbarji, Advocate‑General, N.‑W.F.P. and Mian Shakirullah Jan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing‑ 11th February, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal, Peshawar, dated 11‑8‑1988, passed in Appeal No.6/NEEM/1986). ‑‑‑8.12.21‑‑North‑West Frontier Province Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R.6‑‑Discharge from service for misconduct‑‑Action taken under 8.12.21 of Police Rules, 1934‑‑Legality‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether the Authority was not debarred to pass order of discharge under 8.12.21 of Police Rules, 1934, after initiating proceedings under North‑West Frontier Province Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, as 8.12.21 of Police Rules applies to those Police Officers who bear service of less than three years. Abdul Karim v. West Pakistan Province P L D 1956 S C 298 rel.
Judgment & Decree
ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal against the judgment of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal, dated 11‑8‑1988.
2. The respondent was a lady police constable who had only put in four months service. During this period a complaint was received by her superiors against her conduct. This complaint was confirmed by the Incharge Women Police. She was served with a show‑cause notice. The reply to the show‑cause notice was found unsatisfactory and thereafter she was discharged from service. She then approached the Service Tribunal by way of an appeal which was allowed through the impugned judgment.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The only ground stressed by him was that there was no bar under the law on the Authority to pass p order under Police Rule 12.21 after initiating proceedings under Police Rules, 1975, as Police Rule 12.21 applies to those police officers who bear service of less than three years. Reliance in this respect was placed on Abdul Karim v. West Pakistan Province (P L D 1956 S C 298). 3‑A. To consider the question raised above, leave is granted. AA./G‑165/S Leave to appeal granted.