1985 PLP 130 (SCMR)
ILLAHI BAKHSH SAMR00 and others — Petitioner Versus REGISTRAR, SOCIETIES and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1985 PLP 130 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ---Art. 185(3)--Election of Co-operative Society--Contention that High Court had failed to notice that Constitutional petition filed by petitioner was virtually in nature of a writ of quo warranto which could not therefore be dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction--Leave to appeal granted to consider contention.--Jurisdiction. |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah, Abdul Qadir Shaikh and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ |
| Parties | ILLAHI BAKHSH SAMR00 and others — Petitioner Versus REGISTRAR, SOCIETIES and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 130 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 130 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ---Art. 185(3)--Election of Co-operative Society--Contention that High Court had failed to notice that Constitutional petition filed by petitioner was virtually in nature of a writ of quo warranto which could not therefore be dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction--Leave to appeal granted to consider contention.--Jurisdiction. bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah, Abdul Qadir Shaikh and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 130 (SCMR) (ILLAHI BAKHSH SAMR00 and others — Petitioner Versus REGISTRAR, SOCIETIES and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- N.A. Faruqui, Advocate Supreme Court with S. M. Abbas Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Muhammad Akram, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmed Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No. 2.
- Faizanul Haq, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No. 3.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 185(3)--Election of Co-operative Society--Contention that High Court had failed to notice that Constitutional petition filed by petitioner was virtually in nature of a writ of quo warranto which could not therefore be dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction--Leave to appeal granted to consider contention.--[Jurisdiction].
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.--This petition relates to election to the post of President of respondent No. 2 Institution. Among three candidates who filed nomination papers, one withdrew his candidature, first petitioner's nomination paper was rejected on the ground that his consent was received one day late and respondent No. 3 was declared as elected unopposed. Petitioners challenged the result of the election in a Constitution petition in Sind High Court but it was dismissed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. Mr. N.A. Faruqui learned counsel appearing in support of this petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of the High Court, inter alia, submits that the High Court has failed to notice that constitution petition filed by petitioners was virtually in the nature of a writ o quo warranto, and it could not, therefore, be dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction. This plea amongst others deserves consideration. Leave is granted. Security Rs. 1,
000. The appeal will be heard on the present record at an early date, but it is open to the parties to file additional documents, if any. Interim order passed by this Court on 17-7-1984 shall continue till appeal is decided. M. Z. M. Leave granted.