1998 PLP 495 (MLD)
Dr. KASHIF RAHIM — Petitioner Versus S.P., MULTAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 495 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Dr. KASHIF RAHIM — Petitioner Versus S.P., MULTAN and others — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 495 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 495 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 495 (MLD) (Dr. KASHIF RAHIM — Petitioner Versus S.P., MULTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Zafar Hussain for Petitioner.
- Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Respondents Nos. l and 2.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 506
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 154 & 201
Telegraph Act (XIII of 1885), S. 29
Constitutional petition
Alternate adequate remedy available
Petitioner who claimed to be a Doctor had alleged that respondent Divisional Engineer alongwith other officials trespassed his shop and not only threatened him to teach him a lesson, but also gave kick and fist blow to him
Petitioner had alleged that, despite his efforts, no case had been registered against the respondents, instead F.I.R. under S. 506, P.P.C. and S. 29 of Telegraph Act, 1885 had been registered against him (the petitioner) with mala fide intention
Petitioner through Constitutional petition had prayed for issuance of a writ about registration of a case against respondents on basis of alleged occurrence
Efficacious remedy of filing a private complaint being available to the petitioner, he could proceed in accordance with law
Constitutional petition filed by petitioner against his alleged grievance was not maintainable.
Judgment & Decree
Writ Petition No.4184 of 1993, decided on 10th November, 1994.
Art. 199
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 506
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 154 & 201
Telegraph Act (XIII of 1885), S. 29
Constitutional petition
Alternate adequate remedy available
Petitioner who claimed to be a Doctor had alleged that respondent Divisional Engineer alongwith other officials trespassed his shop and not only threatened him to teach him a lesson, but also gave kick and fist blow to him
Petitioner had alleged that, despite his efforts, no case had been registered against the respondents, instead F.I.R. under S. 506, P.P.C. and S. 29 of Telegraph Act, 1885 had been registered against him (the petitioner) with mala fide intention
Petitioner through Constitutional petition had prayed for issuance of a writ about registration of a case against respondents on basis of alleged occurrence
Efficacious remedy of filing a private complaint being available to the petitioner, he could proceed in accordance with law
Constitutional petition filed by petitioner against his alleged grievance was not maintainable. Syed Zafar Hussain for Petitioner. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Respondents Nos. l and
2. Grievance voiced through this writ petition is that Kashif Rahim petitioner, who claims to be a doctor, alleged that on 20-8-1993 at 6.00 p.m. Muhammad Azam Khan, Divisional Engineer, Telephones, New Multan Exchange, Multan, Nazar Muhammad, Junior Clerk, and Abdul Ghaffar U.D.C., of New Multan Exchange, respondents Nos.3 to 5, illegal trespassed his shop and threatened him that they would teach him a lesson for complaining against them to the higher officials, that they gave kick and fist blows to him when Nadim and Habib Gujjer shopkeepers having the business close to his clinic arrived and saved him. The grievance of the petitioner is that all has happened as his telephones No.553190 and 553290 installed in the clinic were disconnected. He maintained that in spite his efforts made by him no case has been registered. He added that F.I.R. No.373 dated 28-8-1993, under section 506, P.P.C. and section 29 of the Telegraph Act stands registered at Police Station New Multan with mala fide intention at the instance. of Muhammad . Azam Khan, Divisional Engineer, Telephone respondent No.3, against him with a delay of 10 days. He prayed for the issuance of a writ about the registration of a case on the basis of the aforesaid said occurrence, dated 20-8-1993, which allegedly took place at 6.00 p.m. in his clinic.
2. I have heard the preliminary arguments. It is the admitted position that the instance of Muhammad Azam Khan, Divisional Engineer, Telephones, respondent No.3, case F.I.R. No.373, dated 28-8-1993, stands registered against the petitioner under section 506 P.P.C and section 29 of the Telegraph Act. The telephone connections of the petitioner have been disconnected and the motive can be with him to fax the Officers/Officials of the Telephone Department. In my view the efficacious remedy of filing a private complaint is available to the petitioner and he may proceed in accordance with law. On my query Kashif Rahim, petitioner, present in Court, intimated that he was not a qualified doctor even though he has named himself as Dr. Kashif Rahim in the writ petition. My view is that there is no necessity to get registered the case against respondents Nos.3 to 5 with the intervention of the Court at the relevant police station. I, therefore, dismiss this petition in limine. H.B.T./K-47/L Petition dismissed.