1991 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUL AHID — Petitioner Versus KHADIM HUSSAIN — Respondent
| Citation | 1991 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Shariat Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadin Khan Kundi and Dr. Fida Muhammad Khan, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL AHID — Petitioner Versus KHADIM HUSSAIN — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Federal Shariat Court (Procedure) Rules, 1981 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Federal Shariat Court (Procedure) Rules, 1981 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Shariat Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadin Khan Kundi and Dr. Fida Muhammad Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL AHID — Petitioner Versus KHADIM HUSSAIN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
.
Rr: 31-A & 31-D
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10(2)
Allegation of Zina
Petitioner's wife and her accomplice were acquitted by Federal Shariat Court in appeal
Petitioner came up in review against the said judgment of acquittal after a lapse of four years-- Review petition, he, was hit by the proviso of Rr.31-A & 31-D of the Federal Shariat Court (Procedure) Rules, 1981, because Shariat Court had given the impugned decision in an appeal and no review petition lay against the same-- Every application for review could be filed within ninety days from the date of decision given or order made by Shariat Court
Review petition was dismissed in limine in circumstance. Petitioner in person Nazir Ahmad Ghazi, Asstt. A.-G. and S.D. Qureshi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KARIM KHAN KUNDI, J.
This petition arises in the background of facts that the petitioner's wife Mst. Bashiran after embracing Islam contracted a marriage with one Khadim Hussain. Petitioner filed a complaint before the Additional Sessions Judge, Toba Tek Singh, as against his wife and her accomplice on the charge of Zina liable to Tazir with consent under section 10(2) of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. On trial the Court convicted his wife and her accomplice Khadim Hussain on the charge of Zina who came up in appeal before this Court where, on acceptance of their appeal on 30-10-1986, his wife and her accomplice, Khadim Hussain were acquitted. Petitioner has come in a review against the said judgment and order of the Court after a lapse of four years. His review petition is hit by the proviso of Rule 31-A and Rule 31-D of the Federal Shariat Court (Procedure) Rules, 1981, because this Court has given the impugned decision in an appeal and no review shall lie against it and further every application for review shall be filed within ninety days from the date of the decision given or order made by the Court. This criminal miscellaneous is accordingly dismissed in limine. N.H.Q./571/F.S.C. Petition dismissed.