2008 PLP 354 (MLD)
ABIDA PARVEEN — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT FAISALABAD and 57 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 PLP 354 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABIDA PARVEEN — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT FAISALABAD and 57 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 354 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 354 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 354 (MLD) (ABIDA PARVEEN — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT FAISALABAD and 57 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----S.22-A---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Registration of case---Application for---Justice of Peace directed the police to look into the matter---Case having not been registered by the Police, petitioner filed contempt petition which having been dismissed, petitioner had filed constitutional petition---Report of concerned S.H.O. showed that no proceedings were being initiated because the version of the petitioner was false---Prima facie no ground was made out for interference in the- impugned order---Counsel for petitioner had failed to point out any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order---Petitioner could file private complaint against the culprits if so advised.
- Shoaib Zafar for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S.22-A
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Application for
Justice of Peace directed the police to look into the matter
Case having not been registered by the Police, petitioner filed contempt petition which having been dismissed, petitioner had filed constitutional petition
Report of concerned S.H.O. showed that no proceedings were being initiated because the version of the petitioner was false
Prima facie no ground was made out for interference in the- impugned order
Counsel for petitioner had failed to point out any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order
Petitioner could file private complaint against the culprits if so advised.
Judgment & Decree
FAZAL-E-MIRAN CHAUHAN, J.
The petitioner moved an application under section 22-A, Cr.P.C. before the Justice of Peace/Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad for registration of case. The learned Justice of Peace directed D.I.G. (Operation) to look into the matter and direct the S.H.O. concerned to proceed with the same in accordance with law. The case was not registered by the police hierarchy, therefore, the petitioner moved contempt petition which was dismissed, hence this petition.
2. It is observed by the learned Justice of Peace that the respondent forwarded the report of the S.H.O. Police Station Saddar Ahmad Khan A.S.-I. brought on the record copy of Rapat No.28, dated 20-7-2007. According to which no proceeding is being initiated because the version of the petitioner is false. Similarly copy of report prepared by ASP Saddar, dated 13-6-2007 is also available on record. According to which the petition is false and frivolous. No contemptuous proceedings can be initiated against the respondent. Prima facie no ground is made out for interference in the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any illegality .or irregularity in the impugned order. The petitioner, if so advised, may file private complaint against the culprits. Disposed of. H.B.T./A-197/L Order Accordingly.