2008 PLP 1963 (YLR)
IFTIKHAR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 PLP 1963 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rustam Ali Malik, J |
| Parties | IFTIKHAR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 1963 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 1963 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rustam Ali Malik, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 1963 (YLR) (IFTIKHAR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Chaudhry Abdul Rashid for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.335/337-F(vi)/337-F(iv)/34
Bail application of accused had already been dismissed by High Court and there had been no inordinate delay in the disposal of the case by Trial Court after the dismissal of the previous bail applications of accused
Accused were specifically named in the F.I.R. and were alleged to have caused injuries to the prosecution witness with sharp-edged weapons i.e. a "tapa" and a "Chhura" used by butchers for cutting meat
No fresh ground was available to the accused for grant of bail
Bail application was dismissed accordingly. Chaudhry Iftikhar Ullah Dhillon for the Complainant. Abdul Hameed for the State with Liaqat, Inspector.
Judgment & Decree
RUSTAM ALI MALIK, J.
The petitioners seek bail after arrest in case F.I.R. No.134 of 2003 registered on 6-7-2003 in Police Station Shah Gharib, District Narowal under sections 335, 337-F(vi) and 34, P.P.C.
2. The F.I.R. was lodged by Mehmood Ahmad, complainant, regarding an occurrence which had taken place on 1-7-2003 around 8-00 a.m. Iftikhar Ahmad petitioner had allegedly given a blow with a Tapa (a sharp-edged instrument used for cutting meat) to Kabir Hussain P.W. while Zulfiqar petitioner No.2 gave a blow to Kabir Hussain aforesaid with the Chhura (used for cutting meat). Their third companion Kala also gave him a Chhuri blow. Although he was seriously injured, however Kabir Hussain tried to run away in order to save his life but Iftikhar Hussain raised Lalkara exhorting his co-accused to finish him off. However Kabir Hussain entered the house of Malik Muhammad Anwar running and bolted the door from the inside. The inmates of the house of Muhammad Anwar raised alarm and on which a number of persons gathered and the assailants went away while issuing threats.
3. Arguments have been heard and record perused.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has asserted that petitioner No.2 is a `child' within the meaning of Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 and as such he is entitled to the concession of bail on the said ground as well. He has argued that although the previous bail application of the petitioner had been dismissed by this Court, yet thereafter there has been no progress in the trial whatsoever and hence the petitioners are entitled to the concession of bail on the said ground as well i.e. on account of inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial.
5. The application has been resisted. It may be pointed out here that the previous bail application of Zulfiqar Ali petitioner (Crl. Misc. No.138-B-2004) had been dismissed by this Court on 23-2-2004 while the bail application of Iftikhar Ahmad petitioner (Crl. Misc. No.2589-B-2004) had been dismissed on 18-5-2004 and hence it cannot be said in any way that there has been any inordinate delay in the disposal of the case after the dismissal of the previous bail application of the petitioners. The petitioners are specifically named in the F.I.R. and are alleged to have caused injuries to Kabir Hussain, the injured P.W. with sharp-edged weapons i.e. a Tapa and Chhura, both of which are used by the butchers for cutting meat. There does not appear to be any fresh ground available to the petitioner for the grant of bail. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. N.H.Q./I-57/L Bail refused.