P L D 1957 W (PLP)
MUHAMMAD DIN‑Petitioner Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1957 W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD DIN‑Petitioner Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) Lambardar‑, (b) Lambardar |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1957 W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Lambardar‑, (b) Lambardar as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1957 W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1957 W (PLP) (MUHAMMAD DIN‑Petitioner Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ismail Bhatti for Petitioner.
- Kh. Abdur Rahim and Ghulam Ali Alvi for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Appointment‑Plea that report of Revenue Officer is wrong cannot be taken in revision.
Appointment ‑ Person appointed as Lambardar holding office under crown and not residing in village‑No interference in revision.
Judgment & Decree
H. A. MAJID.‑
The petitioner belongs to a tribe which is admittedly in a minority in this Patti. He alleges that his tribe is not in minority in the estate as a whole. He has, however, no figures to refer to. The petitioner alleges that the local Revenue Officers have given him an adverse report due to the machinations of the respondent who is an office Kanungo in one of the Tahsils. This allegation cannot be raised at 'the present stage, and the correct place, where it should have been raised, was either before the Collector or the Commissioner. The petitioned further claims that the respondent should have been debarred from this appointment, because he is holding office under the Crown and does not live in the village. I do not think that I shall interfere in this Lambardari appointment on that account. The Collector will obviously make suitable arrangements for a Sarbrah for the respondent in his appointment as Lambardar. For the above reasons, I dismiss this petition for revision. K. M. A. Petition dismissed.