2005 PLP 1759 (MLD)
Miss SUMAIRA NOSHEEN — Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF COMMERCE, VEHARI and 3 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2005 PLP 1759 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Miss SUMAIRA NOSHEEN — Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF COMMERCE, VEHARI and 3 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Educational Institution |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1759 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Educational Institution as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1759 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1759 (MLD) (Miss SUMAIRA NOSHEEN — Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF COMMERCE, VEHARI and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muntazir Mehdi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Expulsion from college-,-Petitioner felt aggrieved of report and notification whereby she was expelled from college for one year and her admission B. Com. Part-I, Examination from University had also been withdrawn
Said Notification was subject to review/appeal, which was stated to have been filed by the petitioner
Constitutional petition was disposed of by the High Court with direction that review/appeal be taken up without any further loss of time as examinations were about to begin and that in case petitioner had tendered apology, she would be treated like her co-students in the matter and would be allowed to take part in examination as a regular student
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner, a student of B.Com. Part-I, feels aggrieved of the report and the Notification dated 22-6-2005 whereby she has been expelled from the College for one year and her admission of B.Com. Part-I Examination for Baha-u.d-Din Zakaria University, Multan, has also been withdrawn.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that notwithstanding the contents of the writ petition, his client should have been given a chance to re-consider and to tender due apology as was done by her similarly charged co-students who has been only issued a warning.
3. I have examined the report and the said notification. Without making any further comments, I find that the Notification dated 22-6-2005 is subject to a review/appeal which is stated to have been filed. If this is so, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the said review/appeal be taken up without any further loss of time as the examinations are about to begin. It is further directed that in case the petitioner duly tenders apology, she will be treated like her co-student in the matter and would be allowed to take part in the examination as a regular student. A copy of this order be immediately remitted to the respondents. H.B.T./S-406/L Order accepted.