1989 PLP 1722 (SCMR)
Dr. IRSHAD HASAN KHAN Petitioner Versus LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and another Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1722 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Dr. IRSHAD HASAN KHAN Petitioner Versus LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and another Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1722 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1722 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1722 (SCMR) (Dr. IRSHAD HASAN KHAN Petitioner Versus LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and another Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.Ahmad Hasan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A.Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ehsanullah Lilla, Advocate, Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No. 2.
- Ncmo for Respondent No. 1.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 14‑2‑1988 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Civil Revision No. 816 of 1983). ‑‑O. XXIII. R.3. 1 & 2‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑Temporary injunction‑‑Petitioner's application for temporary injunction was refused by the three Courts below‑‑Discretionary jurisdiction exercised in the matter of grant of temporary injunction was not interfered with by Supreme Court‑‑Petition for leave to appeal wits dismissed. Dale of hearing: 16th May, 1988.
Judgment & Decree
M.Ahmad Hasan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A.Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Ehsanullah Lilla, Advocate, Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.
2. Ncmo for Respondent No.
1. Dale of hearing: 16th May, 1988. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, .J‑‑This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the dismissal of petitioner's Civil Revision, calling in question refusal of the trial Court to grant him temporary injunction during the pendency of his suit‑‑The refusal was also affirmed by the appellate Court. .
2. After hearing both the learned counsel, we do not consider it a fit case for interference with the discretionary jurisdiction exercised in the matter of grant of temporary injunction. It is further observed that the orders passed on the question temporary injunction shall not in any way influence the course of trial l of the civil suit.
3. With this observation leave to appeal is refused and the petition is dismissed. M.A.K./1‑83/S Petition dismissed.