PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

ABDUL MUNIR, D.S.P. Versus THE HOME SECRETARY, PUNJAB and 3 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Punjab
Decided Date
Appeal No.12A of 1989, decided on 5th November, 1990.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman Malik Abdul Aziz, Member
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Punjab
Bench Members Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman Malik Abdul Aziz, Member
Parties ABDUL MUNIR, D.S.P. Versus THE HOME SECRETARY, PUNJAB and 3 others
Primary Law Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman Malik Abdul Aziz, Member.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ABDUL MUNIR, D.S.P. Versus THE HOME SECRETARY, PUNJAB and 3 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)

Representation

  • Malik Asghar Ali for Appellant.
  • Manzoor Hussain, DA. for Respondents
  • Date of hearing: 5th November, 1990.

Headnotes / Summary

S.4

Appeal

Adverse remarks in A.C.R: -Performance evaluation report for specified period on the working of civil servant was recorded by Reporting Officer, keeping in view general reputation of civil servant as well as personal knowledge gained by Reporting Officer

Civil servant was found to be negligent on most of the assignments

Adverse remarks having been recorded, keeping in view general reputation, capability and overall working of civil servant, his departmental representation was rightly rejected on merits-- Decision of departmental authorities was maintained.

Judgment & Decree

Appeal No.12A of 1989, decided on 5th November, 1990.

S.4

Appeal

Adverse remarks in A.C.R: -Performance evaluation report for specified period on the working of civil servant was recorded by Reporting Officer, keeping in view general reputation of civil servant as well as personal knowledge gained by Reporting Officer

Civil servant was found to be negligent on most of the assignments

Adverse remarks having been recorded, keeping in view general reputation, capability and overall working of civil servant, his departmental representation was rightly rejected on merits-- Decision of departmental authorities was maintained. Malik Asghar Ali for Appellant. Manzoor Hussain, DA. for Respondents Date of hearing: 5th November, 1990.