1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
AKBAR ALI Versus DEPUTY GAME WARDEN, MULTAN/BAHAWALPUR CIVIL DIVISIONS,
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | AKBAR ALI Versus DEPUTY GAME WARDEN, MULTAN/BAHAWALPUR CIVIL DIVISIONS, |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (AKBAR ALI Versus DEPUTY GAME WARDEN, MULTAN/BAHAWALPUR CIVIL DIVISIONS,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Riaz for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 28th April, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Remarks given by Reporting Officer about various aspects of conduct and performance of civil servant, were based on an inadequate period of observation and experience
During 115 days which covered disputed report, Reporting Officer remained on tour for a total of 100 days, thus even though he remained supervisory officer of civil servant for almost jour months, but he had little occasion to supervise
Person who remained- on tour for such a long period, could not be expected to express any opinion about punctuality of civil servant
With regard to adverse remarks relating to civil servant's relationship with public, his superiors, colleagues and subordinates about output and quality of his work, no complaints or record of adverse nature were produced during course of proceedings to substantiate those remarks
Remarks `reported to be corrupt' against civil servant were vague remarks as no material on record had been produced by Authorities in support of allegations that reputation of civil servant was not good
Remarks `not yet fit for promotion', could not be construed to be adverse as those remarks only denoted that official had to gain some more experience before he could become fit for promotion
All 18 reports except disputed one against civil servant were satisfactory and even in adverse confidential report, integrity of civil servant was not doubted
Order of Authority against civil servant was set aside and adverse remarks against him were ordered to be expunged.
Judgment & Decree
BAHAWALPUR and 2 others Appeal No. 526 of 1990, decided on 18th June, 1991.
Remarks given by Reporting Officer about various aspects of conduct and performance of civil servant, were based on an inadequate period of observation and experience
During 115 days which covered disputed report, Reporting Officer remained on tour for a total of 100 days, thus even though he remained supervisory officer of civil servant for almost jour months, but he had little occasion to supervise
Person who remained- on tour for such a long period, could not be expected to express any opinion about punctuality of civil servant
With regard to adverse remarks relating to civil servant's relationship with public, his superiors, colleagues and subordinates about output and quality of his work, no complaints or record of adverse nature were produced during course of proceedings to substantiate those remarks
Remarks `reported to be corrupt' against civil servant were vague remarks as no material on record had been produced by Authorities in support of allegations that reputation of civil servant was not good
Remarks `not yet fit for promotion', could not be construed to be adverse as those remarks only denoted that official had to gain some more experience before he could become fit for promotion
All 18 reports except disputed one against civil servant were satisfactory and even in adverse confidential report, integrity of civil servant was not doubted
Order of Authority against civil servant was set aside and adverse remarks against him were ordered to be expunged. M.A. Riaz for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondent. Date of hearing: 28th April, 1991.