YLR 2026

2026 PLP 972 (YLR)

Muhammad Rafique — Appellant Versus The State and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2026-March-11
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2026 PLP 972 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties Muhammad Rafique — Appellant Versus The State and another — Respondents
Primary Law Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act (XXX of 2021)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2026 PLP 972 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act (XXX of 2021) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2026 PLP 972 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2026 PLP 972 (YLR) (Muhammad Rafique — Appellant Versus The State and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act (XXX of 2021)

Representation

  • Hafiz Muhammad Latif Khawaja, Additional Advocate General along with Rafique, ASI.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 22(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 376 & 511

Attempt to commit zina bil jabr

False complaint

Sentence, reduction in

Agony of proceedings faced by convict

Appellant/complainant (of false complaint) was convicted under S.22(2) of Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act, 2021 ('the Anti-Rape Act') and Trial Court sentenced him to imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs. 100,000/- and in default whereof, to further undergo two months simple imprisonment

Validity

Re-appraisal of evidence though revealed that the appellant had rightly been convicted by the Trial Court in offence under S.22(2) of Anti-Rape Act, however, considering the facts of present case, the agony of proceedings faced by the appellant and with the consent of Law Officers, while maintaining the conviction of the appellant in offence under S.22(2) of Anti-Rape Act, the sentence of the appellant was reduced to that he had already undergone

Amount of fine, as imposed by the Trial Court upon the appellant was maintained, however the punishments in default thereof, were reduced from two months to one week simple imprisonment

High Court made modification in the quantum of sentence

Appeal, filed by complainant, was disposed of accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

Muhammad Rafique (appellant) being complainant in case FIR No. 1243 dated 05.10.2023 offence under Sections 376/511, P.P.C registered at Police Station Khudian District Kasur was tried separately by learned Addl. Sessions Judge/Anti-Rape Court, Kasur and vide order/judgment dated 17.03.2025 passed by learned trial Court, the appellant has been convicted under Section 22(2) of Anti-Rape Act and sentenced to imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.100,000/- and in default whereof, to further undergo two months simple imprisonment.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Law Officers and perused the record.

3. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not press conviction of the appellant but has requested for reduction of his sentence awarded by learned trial Court to that already undergone by him. On the other hand, learned law Officers have no objection for reduction of sentence of the appellant.

4. On our reappraisal of evidence, we are of the view that the appellant has rightly been convicted by the learned trial Court in offence under Section 22(2) of Anti-Rape Act. Coming to the reduction of sentence of appellant, considering the facts of this case, the agony of proceedings faced by the appellant and with the consent of learned Law Officers, while maintaining the conviction of the appellant in offence under Section 22(2) of Anti-Rape Act, the sentence of the appellant (reproduced in para 1 of this order) is reduced to that has already undergone by him. The amount of fine, as imposed by learned trial Court upon the appellant is maintained, however the punishment in default thereof, are reduced from two months to one week simple imprisonment.

5. With the above said modification in the quantum of sentence, this criminal appeal is disposed of. MQ/M-61/L Order accordingly.