2005 PLP 813 (YLR)
ALI MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2005 PLP 813 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Anwar Zaheer Jamali, J |
| Parties | ALI MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 813 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 813 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Anwar Zaheer Jamali, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 813 (YLR) (ALI MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.526‑‑‑Transfer of case‑‑‑Only ground urged in transfer application was that parties involved in the case had compromised their dispute but due to non‑availability of Presiding Officer of the concerned Court, matter could not be disposed of‑‑‑State counsel had no objection for transfer of case and even complainant had no objection against such transfer‑‑ Allowing the application, case was transferred accordingly. Abdul Rasool Abbassi for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari State Counsel. Opponent No.2 Nazeer Ahmad son of Muhammad Jumman is also present in Court.
Judgment & Decree
Anwar H. Ansari State Counsel. Opponent No.2 Nazeer Ahmad son of Muhammad Jumman is also present in Court.
1. Granted.
2. This transfer application under section 526, Cr.P.C. has been moved by the applicants/accused for seeking transfer of Sessions Case No.215 of 2002 (The State v. Ali Muhammad and others) from the Court of IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Dadu to any other Court at Dadu, having jurisdiction in the matter. The only ground urged in the, transfer application is that private parties to the above referred Sessions Case arising out of Crime No.47 of 2002 have compromised their dispute, but due to the non‑availability of the Presiding Officer of the concerned Court, the matter could not be disposed of. Mr. Anwar H. Ansari, the learned State Counsel has no objection for transfer of above referred case, so also the opponent No.2 Nazeer Ahmed, who is complainant in the case, has any objection. In view of the above this criminal transfer application is allowed in the terms that the learned District and Sessions Judge Dadu, shall transfer Sessions Case No. 215 of 2002 either to his own Court or to any other Court at Dadu having jurisdiction in the matter. Disposed of. H.B.T./A‑161/K Application allowed.