P L D 1979 Lahore 33 (PLP)
GHULAM NABI ETC: — Petitioners Versus BASHIR AHMAD ETc.-Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1979 Lahore 33 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | S. 24-Transfer of civil cases-Mere fact of decision of a regular first appeal being dependent upon decision of two appeals pending before District Judge-No ground for transferring such cases to High Court.-Transfer of civil case. |
| Bench Members | Aftab Hussain, J |
| Parties | GHULAM NABI ETC: — Petitioners Versus BASHIR AHMAD ETc.-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Lahore 33 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Lahore 33 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the S. 24-Transfer of civil cases-Mere fact of decision of a regular first appeal being dependent upon decision of two appeals pending before District Judge-No ground for transferring such cases to High Court.-Transfer of civil case. bench comprising: Aftab Hussain, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Lahore 33 (PLP) (GHULAM NABI ETC: — Petitioners Versus BASHIR AHMAD ETc.-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munir A. Sheikh for Petitioners.
- Khalil-ur-Rehman Khan for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 24-Transfer of civil cases-Mere fact of decision of a regular first appeal being dependent upon decision of two appeals pending before District Judge-No ground for transferring such cases to High Court.-[Transfer of civil case].
Judgment & Decree
I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. There appears t be no reason for depriving the learned Additional District Judge of hi jurisdiction to decide the appeals pending before him. If the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge be against the petitioners, heir proper remedy will be to file a second appeal or revision as may be necessary. The- mere fact that the decision of the Regular First Appeal is dependent upon the decision of the two appeals pending before the learned additional District Judge, is no ground for transferring those cases to this court. The petition is dismissed. S. A. H. Petition rejected.