PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

HAIDER HASSAN ZAIDI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, SECRETARY COMMUNICATION,

Jurisdiction / Court
Federal Service Tribunal
Decided Date
Appeal No. 159-L of 1987, decided on 26th November, 1991.
Honorable Judges
S.M. Ishaque and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Members
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Federal Service Tribunal
Bench Members S.M. Ishaque and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Members
Parties HAIDER HASSAN ZAIDI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, SECRETARY COMMUNICATION,
Primary Law (b) Civil service, (a) Civil service
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil service, (a) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: S.M. Ishaque and Ch. Hasan Nawaz, Members.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (HAIDER HASSAN ZAIDI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, SECRETARY COMMUNICATION,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Civil service (a) Civil service

Representation

  • Hafiz Tariq Naseem for Respondents:
  • Date of hearing: 25th November, 1991.

Headnotes / Summary

Appeal

Maintainability of

During pendency of appeal, claim in appeal made by civil servant, was granted by Authority

Prayer made by civil servant in his appeal having been granted, appeal had become infructuous.

Appeal

Amendment in Memorandum of Appeal

On application of appellant/civil servant for amendment of appeal, amendment as prayed for was allowed, but amendment made in appeal was in utter disregard of prayer made by civil servant in his application and altogether a different case had been set up by him

Amended appeal being beyond scope of prayer made in application for amendment which was not in accordance with permission of. Tribunal, had to be dismissed as incompetent. Appellant in person,

Judgment & Decree

(a) Civil service

Appeal

Maintainability of

During pendency of appeal, claim in appeal made by civil servant, was granted by Authority

Prayer made by civil servant in his appeal having been granted, appeal had become infructuous. (b) Civil service

Appeal

Amendment in Memorandum of Appeal

On application of appellant/civil servant for amendment of appeal, amendment as prayed for was allowed, but amendment made in appeal was in utter disregard of prayer made by civil servant in his application and altogether a different case had been set up by him

Amended appeal being beyond scope of prayer made in application for amendment which was not in accordance with permission of. Tribunal, had to be dismissed as incompetent. Appellant in person, Hafiz Tariq Naseem for Respondents: Date of hearing: 25th November, 1991.