1998 PLP 130 (SCMR)
Malik ASAD ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 2 others‑:‑Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 130 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Saiduzzaman Siddiqui, Fazal Eahi Khan Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan, Nasir Aslam Zahid, Munawar Ahmad Mirza, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, Sh. Ijaz Nisar, Abdur Rahman Khan and Sh. Riaz Ahmad, JJ |
| Parties | Malik ASAD ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 2 others‑:‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 130 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 130 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Saiduzzaman Siddiqui, Fazal Eahi Khan Irshad Hasan Khan, Raja Afrasiab Khan, Nasir Aslam Zahid, Munawar Ahmad Mirza, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, Sh. Ijaz Nisar, Abdur Rahman Khan and Sh. Riaz Ahmad, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 130 (SCMR) (Malik ASAD ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 2 others‑:‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 30th November, 1997.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art. 184(3)‑‑‑Constitutional petition under Art.184(3), Constitution of Pakistan‑‑‑Judicial order of three Judges of the Supreme Court passed Constitutional petition under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution restraining the Chief Justice of Pakistan from performing administrative or judicial functions‑‑ Chief Justice (under restraint) not only fixed cases before two Benches; one consisting of himself and four other Judges of Supreme Court and another Bench consisting of Chief Justice (under restraint) and two other Judges, but had also issued an administrative order declaring convening of Full Court for hearing the cases in a supplementary cause list‑‑‑Validity‑=‑Held, in circumstances, any administrative order passed by the Chief Justice (under restraint) and‑any judicial order passed by a Bench presided over by the Chief Justice (under restraint) was to be totally ignored by all and sundry without lawful authority and of no legal effect.
Judgment & Decree
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.
An administrative order passed by Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, the Honourable Chief Justice (under restraint) has been delivered to us at our residences declaring the convening of Full Court for hearing of the cases listed in Supplementary Cause List No.405 of 1997, as illegal. We are sorry to say that in spite of a judicial order of a three members' Bench of this Court passed in C.P. No. 248-Q of 1997 on 28-11-1997 restraining the Hon'ble Chief Justice from performing administrative or judicial functions, the Hon'ble Chief Justice (under restraint) has not only fixed cases before two Benches; one consisting of himself and four other learned Judges of this Court and another Bench- consisting of Hon'ble Chief Justice (under restraint) and two other learned Judges of this Court, but has also issued the above administrative order. The issuance of above cause list, fixing of cases before the two Benches I mentioned above and the abovementioned administrative orders are wholly illegal and of no legal effect in view of the order passed by the Quetta Bench on 28-1-1997 in C.P. No. 248-Q of 1997 and, therefore, are to be totally ignored. We may also point out that the present Full Court has been convened in pursuance of the direction given by a Bench of this Court functioning at Peshawar in C.P. No.1-P of 1997. The objection regarding entertainment of Constitutional petitions under Article 184(3) of the Constitution at places. Other than Principal Seat has been fully dealt with and all the points raised now in above administrative order of Hon'ble Chief Justice (under restraint) has been fully explained and answered in two orders passed by the two different Benches of this Court functioning at Peshawar and Quetta dated 27-11-1997 and, therefore, they need not be repeated here. We will, however, refrain from making any comments on the merits of the appointment of Hon'ble Chief Justice (under restraint) raised in the above administrative notes as the matter is now subjudice before the Full Court and will be dealt with judicially. We therefore, hold that any administrative order passed by the Hon'blel Chief Justice (under restraint) and any judicial order passed by a Bench presided over by the Hon'ble Chief Justice (under restraint) is to be totally ignored by all and sundry without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The above order has been passed by us after we received the above administrative order and thereafter we all assembled in the Rest House No.12, Islamabad, in view of the urgency in the matter. A copy of this order may be brought to the notice of the two Benches presided every by the Hon'ble Chief Justice (under restraint). (Sd.) Saiduzzaman Siddiqui, J. (Sd.) Fazal Ilahi Khan, J. (Sd.) Irshad Hasan Khan, J. (Sd.) Nasir Aslam Zahid. J (Sd.) Munawar Ahmad Mirza, 3. (Sd.) Khalil-ur-Rehman Khan, J. Sh. Ijaz Nisar, J. (Sd.) Abdur Rehman Khan, J. (Sd.) Sh. Riaz Ahmad, J. M.B.A./A-28/S Order accordingly.