1988 PLP 1793 (SCMR)
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD — Respondent
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1793 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1793 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1793 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1793 (SCMR) (FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh.Abdul Majid, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-to-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 13th July, 1988.
- Sh.Abdul Majid, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate-to‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 24-9-1981 in Appeal No.152/722 of 1980).
Ss.4 & 5--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)--Leave to appeal, grant of--Appreciation of evidence--Entitlement to Secretariat Pay--Order of Service Tribunal granting partial relief impugned--Plea that Tribunal had acted contrary to law and evidence in giving partial relief to respondent, repelled--Impugned judgment having been passed after thorough examination of merits and record of case and no specific error of law or question of public importance requiring examination by. Supreme Court having been pointed out, leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM NIUJADDID MIRZA, J.‑‑Secretary to Government of Punjab, Finance Department, Lahore; Member (Establishment) Board of Revenue, Punjab, Lahore and Accountant‑General, Punjab, Lahore seek leave to appeal against the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 24‑9‑1981. The Tribunal on the appeal of respondent Mushtaq Ahmad held that he was not entitled to the Secretariat pay scale from 1‑5‑1963 to 31‑5‑1964. The Tribunal further. observed "otherwise it is his due and right being a person working in the BOR". The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent was not entitled to even this much of relief. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners the Tribunal acted contrary to law and evidence in giving partial relief to the respondent. We don't think it is so. The Tribunal after thorough examination of the merits and going through the relevant dates of the respondent'? career passed the impugned judgment. Learned counsel for the petitioners was unable to point out any specific error of law or question of public importance which, requires examination by this Court. It is not a fit case for leave to appeal. M.I./S‑179/S Petition dismissed.