1993 PLP 1170 (MLD)
JAMIL AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1993 PLP 1170 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Qaiser Ahmed Hamidi, J |
| Parties | JAMIL AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 1170 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 1170 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Qaiser Ahmed Hamidi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 1170 (MLD) (JAMIL AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 4th February, 1993.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.399/400‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Offence against accused, according to F.I.R., fell under S.402, P.P.C. and not under S.399 or 400, P.P.C.‑‑‑Accused was granted bail in circumstances. Muhammad Ayub Memon v. The State 1990 PCr.LJ 41 rel. M. Hayat Qureshi for A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
This is an application for bail made on behalf of applicant Jamil Ahmad, who is detained in Crime No.279 of 1992, Taimuria P.S., under section 399/400, P.P.C. The bail application made on his behalf was rejected earlier by learned Sessions Judge (Central) Karachi, vide order 6‑12‑1992.
2. I have heard Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. M. Hayat Qureshi, learned counsel for State. The latter has opposed the bail application by stating that it is premature to grant bail to applicant at this stage.
3. The perusal of the F.I.R. makes it clear that offence against applicant, if any, will fall under section 402, P.P.C. and not under section 399 or 400, P.P.C. The case of Muhammad Ayub Memon v. The State reported in 1990 PCr.LJ 41, is a direct authority on this point.
4. Having regard to the above position, bail is granted to applicant in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q‑/J‑154/K Bail granted.