2007 PLP 1268 (YLR)
FAQIR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1268 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, J |
| Parties | FAQIR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1268 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1268 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1268 (YLR) (FAQIR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Rasheed Rashid for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 420/468/471/506-Pre-arrest bail
Similar bail application filed by accused had already been dismissed by Sessions Court for non-prosecution
Accused was directed by High Court to move fresh bail application before the Sessions Court
Sessions Court was also directed to decide the fresh bail application strictly on merits and in accordance with law uninfluenced by the absence of accused in his previous bail application
Since the accused apprehended his arrest, he was directed not to be arrested till a specific date giving him protection of about two weeks
Bail application was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR ARSHAD, J.
C.M. No.1 of 2005. Allowed and disposed of. Main Petition
2. Petitioner's similar application was dismissed in default by the learned Sessions Judge, Rahimyar Khan on 8-6-2005. The petitioner may move fresh application to the learned Sessions Judge, Rahimyar Khan and A if any such application is moved the learned Sessions Judge shall decide the same strictly on merits and in accordance with law uninfluenced by the absence of the petitioner on 8-6-2005.
3. Since the petitioner apprehends his arrest, it is directed that he shall not be arrested till 30-6-2005 and this order shall, however, lapse at 2-00 p.m. on 30-6-2005. N.H.Q./F-3/L Order accordingly.