MLD 1994

1994 PLP 1287 (MLD)

BARKAT ALI — Petitioner Versus I$HAQUE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1993-December-20
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 1287 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties BARKAT ALI — Petitioner Versus I$HAQUE and another — Respondents
Primary Law (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1287 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1287 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1287 (MLD) (BARKAT ALI — Petitioner Versus I$HAQUE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ch. Muhammad Ibrahim for Petitioner.
  • Ghulam Bari Salimi and M. Akram Qureshi for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497/498

Bail

Ultimate merits of the case are not to be discussed in a bail matter.

S. 497(5)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302/324/148/149

Bail, cancellation of

Accused had been found innocent by the Police

One accused was not originally named in the F.I.R. and his identification parade had not been held

Bail allowed to accused by Sessions Court was not cancelled in circumstances.

S. 497(5)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/324/148/149-'-Bail, cancellation of

Accused had the motive and had given kicks and fist blows to the deceased prima facie resulting in or leading to his death

Occurrence. seemed to have been reported to the Police in the natural m1a an,:., as three inmates of the house had been injured

Bail granted to accused b,; Sessions Court was cancelled in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

This order will dispose of Criminal Miscellaneous No.3650/C-B of 1993 and Criminal Miscellaneous No.3649/C-B of 1993 as these relate to the same F.I.R.

2. The occurrence took place at 5-30 p.m. on 20-5-1993 wherein Rashid deceased, the son of Barkat Ali, complainant/petitioner, his wife Parveen and son Nadeem were physically molested and injured, ostensibly with bricks, kicks and fist blows, over the dispute of a house with respect to which civil litigation was going on between Shaukat respondent on the one hand and the complainant's family on the other.

3. Rashid went unconscious at the spot, was taken to the hospital and soon expired. The F.I.R. was lodged at 7-00 p.m.

4. The version as to the actual. occurrence, leaving the details as to the motive and the civil litigation, is that when the respondents came to pull down the fresh construction raised on the roof of the house which was in dispute, Rashid, Parveen and Nadeem resisted and firstly they were given bricks blows, then Rashid was pulled down on the Lalkara of Ishaq, Taj Din and Ramzan respondents and severely given kicks and fist blows by Shaukat, Ramzan and Shabbir respondents. The doctor observed six injuries on the person of the deceased in post-mortem report and when read out in Court to me some of these seem to be multiple. The visceras were sent to the Bectrologist and the report was that due to psychological strain and trouble in the heart, the death was accelerated.

5. Ishaq, Taj. Din and Ramzan were granted bails before arrest and Shaukat Shabbir and Ramzan bails after arrest by Mr. Saghir. Ahmad Qadri, Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore. 'Before proceeding further a note of caution and warning to the Additional Sessions Judge that in bail matters the ultimate merits are not to be discussed. He has written a sort of lengthy judgment coveting all the aspects of the case, he should be careful in future. The remarks recorded be conveyed to him and placed on his record.

6. The police found Ishaq, Taj Din, Ramzan and Katru as innocent. Riaz was not originally named is the F.I.R. nor his identification. parade was held. Hence, so far as these respondents are concerned, the petition for cancellation of bails is dismissed.

7. So far as Shaukat and Shabbir, respondents are concerned, they are relatives inter se. They had the motive i.e. of dispute of the house in civil litigation and it were 'they who gave the kicks and fist blows to the deceased resulting or leading to the death of the deceased prima facie. The occurrence seems to have been reported in the natural manner as the inmates of the house Rashid, Parveen and Nadeem were injured. Without appreciating as to what actually would be the offence, there was no ground to grant bail to Shaukat and Shabbir at this stage. The petition to that extent is accepted and bail granted to them (Shaukat Ali and Shabbir) is hereby cancelled. They be taken into custody and sent to judicial lock-up. N.H.O./B-115/L , Order accordingly.