2011 PLP 2869 (YLR)
Miss SUBEEN MUKHTAR — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN and 3 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2011 PLP 2869 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Mushir Alam, C. J. and Imam Bux Baloch, JJ |
| Parties | Miss SUBEEN MUKHTAR — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN and 3 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 2869 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 2869 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Mushir Alam, C. J. and Imam Bux Baloch, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 2869 (YLR) (Miss SUBEEN MUKHTAR — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nisar A. Mujahid for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioner had sought directions for issuance of degree, without further lapse of time as she had appeared and qualified for the same
Authorities had stated that petitioner could be directed to appear in the viva voce to qualify for award of the degree as per Rules and Regulations of the concerned University
Authorities were directed to issue fresh call letter to examine and evaluate viva voce of the petitioner without being influenced of the fact that petitioner had approached the High Court to seek some relief
High Court expected that petitioner would be meted out a proper treatment in accordance with law. Muhammad Ashraf Khan Mughal, D.A.-G.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner seeks directions for issuance of MBA Degree without further lapse of time as she has appeared and qualified for the same. According to comments the respondents stated in conclusion that "the petitioner may be directed to appear in the viva voce to qualify for award of MBA Degree as per rules and regulations of the respondent University." According to learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner has received call letter for the viva voce, but in view of pendency of this petition she could not avail the same,' in the circumstances since any substance, right and entitlement of the petitioner is not disputed, only controversy was her appearance for viva voce in Islamabad or at Karachi as may be deemed appropriate by the university concerned. We would direct that the respondent shall issue fresh call letter to examine and evaluate viva voce to the petitioner without being influenced of the fact that the petitioner has approached this Court to seek some relief. It is expected that petitioner will be meted out a proper treatment in accordance with law. Call letter be issued preferably within a period of three days from today giving reasonable time to, the petitioner to make arrangement to appear before the concerned authority. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./S-94/K???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.