2017 P Cr (PLP)
ISHAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE through ANF Police Station Airport Road, Gilgit — Respondent
| Citation | 2017 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ISHAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE through ANF Police Station Airport Road, Gilgit — Respondent |
| Primary Law | (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 P Cr (PLP) (ISHAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE through ANF Police Station Airport Road, Gilgit — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Amjad Hussain for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Control of Narcotic Substances Ordinance (XLVII of 1995). S. 9(c)
Prosecution story was that ten kilogram heroin was recovered from the possession of accused
Allegedly heroin was recovered from the bags containing walnuts, which were booked by some one else
News regarding recovery of heroin from the bags of walnuts struck head line of the various newspapers of the following day
Said news remained un-rebutted
Receipt of Goods Forwarding Agency from where the consignment was booked by some one else had not been denied by the prosecution
No concrete steps were taken by the prosecution for arrest of main culprit
Circumstances brought the case of accused within the ambit of further inquiry
Bail was allowed in circumstances.
S. 497
Judicial notice of news published in newspapers
Scope
Judicial notice of news published in newspapers could be taken, if not rebutted by the concerned authorities.
Judgment & Decree
MALIK HAQ NAWAZ, J.
The petitioner was booked under section 9(c), C.N.S.A. vide FIR No. 07/2016 dated 30-05-2016, registered at police station ANF Gilgit.
2. The story unfolded in the FIR is that ANF officials received a spy information that one Muhammad Taqi son of Habibullah resident of Nagar and one Haji Abdul Rehman, resident of Mardan, who are notorious international smuggler will try to smuggle the Heroin to China through Sust border. The ANF officials were further informed that one of their agent will come from Morkhoon to Sust and will hand over the Narcotics to any particular customer. The ANF officials constituted a raiding party and they set out at about 15:00 hours from Gilgit to Morkhoon. As reaching Morkhoon they kept a vigilant eye on the suspected persons. At about 15:45, hours a person appeared at the scene of occurrence who was holding a black bag in his hand. He was over powered by the ANF Staff and on search of the bag five packets of heroin were recovered and each packet was containing 2000 grams of heroin and thus the total weight of heroin 10,000 grams was recovered. 10 grams of heroin was separated from each packet for chemical expert opinion and the recovered heroin was sealed in a parcel and recovery memo was accordingly prepared in the presence of marginal witnesses.
3. The petitioner applied for bail in the Court of Special Judge C.N.S.A., Hunza/Nagar, which was turned down vide order dated 15-08-2016. The petitioner being aggrieved from the order of the learned Special Judge CNSA Hunza/Nagar has approached this Court for concession of bail.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that the case is false and the real facts of the case have been twisted and a tailored story has been put forth by the ANF officials just to screen off the real culprits and the petitioner has been made a scapegoat just to fill in the blanks. The learned counsel further stated that the heroin was recovered from the bags containing walnuts as evident from the documents placed at page 10 of the file clearly shows that 60 bags of walnuts were booked from goods forwarding agency head office Peshawar, Haji Camp, Street 5, plot No. 56, Peshawar and the news regarding recovery of heroin from the above walnuts bags struck head line of the various news papers i.e. Daily Rahber, Daily Mahasib and Daily Ausaf of the following day of the occurrence which fact have not been denied by the respondent. The learned counsel stated that in view of the above unique circumstances the case has become as a case of further inquiry under section 497(2), Cr.P.C. and the petitioner be released on bail.
5. On the other hand the learned Special Prosecutor of ANF opposed the bail petition with full force and submitted that as per record made available to him by the ANF officials the petitioner/accused is prima facie linked with the offence and a huge quantity of narcotics worth billion of rupees has been recovered from the possession of petitioner/accused, hence he is not entitled for the concession of bail.
6. We heard both the learned counsel of the parties at length and also perused the record of the case minutely. It is not denied by the learned Special Prosecutor of ANF that the news published in above referred various news papers still remains un-rebutted. The receipt of goods forwarding agency stationed at Peshawar from where the consignment was booked by one Abdul Rehman also has not been denied by the learned special prosecutor ANF.
7. We repeatedly asked the learned special prosecutor of ANF about any concrete steps taken for arrest of the main accused but the learned Special Prosecutor ANF was unable to satisfy us regarding the above queries. Now it is a settled proposition of law that judicial notice of a news published in newspapers could be taken if not rebutted by the concerned authorities.
8. We are of the view that a case for grant of bail has been made out, the petitioner is allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,00000/- (twenty lac only) with two sureties each in the like amount to satisfaction of the trial Court. JK/240/GB Bail granted.