1987 PLP 1120(1) (MLD)
MASHOOQ ALI alias BHOLA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1120(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | : Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J |
| Parties | MASHOOQ ALI alias BHOLA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1120(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1120(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: : Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1120(1) (MLD) (MASHOOQ ALI alias BHOLA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Dr. Farooq A. Chaudhry for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) S.10--Bail--Federal Shariat Court while setting aside conviction and sentence of accused and remanding case ordered that accused would remain in custody till final decision of case--High Court, held, could not sit in judgment on aforesaid order of Federal Shariat Court- Bail refused. Fazal-ur-Rehman for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 650-B of 1987, decided: on 17th March, 1987.
S. 497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) S.10--Bail--Federal Shariat Court while setting aside conviction and sentence of accused and remanding case ordered that accused would remain in custody till final decision of case--High Court, held, could not sit in judgment on aforesaid order of Federal Shariat Court- Bail refused. Dr. Farooq A. Chaudhry for Petitioner. Fazal-ur-Rehman for the State. The petitioner was convicted under section 10(3) of Ordinance VII of 1979 and sentenced to 14 years' R.I. and whipping numbering 30 stripes. In appeal his conviction and sentence was set aside by the Federal Shariat Court vide judgment dated 28-10-1986 and case was remanded for fresh decision. After going through the aforesaid judgment and the order dated 19-2-1987, pissed in suo motu review No.l/L of 1987, I find that while remanding the case the Federal A Shariat Court had ordered that the appellant (petitioner herein) shall continue to be in custody till the final disposal of the case. This Court cannot sit in judgment on the aforesaid order of the Federal Shariat Court. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. M.Y.H/M-352/L Bail refused