1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
RAB NAWAZ Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 9 others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Service Tribunal |
| Bench Members | Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman, Rana Rifat Saeed and Misbah Ullah Khan, Members |
| Parties | RAB NAWAZ Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 9 others |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman, Rana Rifat Saeed and Misbah Ullah Khan, Members.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (RAB NAWAZ Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 9 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Raja Muhammad Asghar Khan for Appellant.
- Date of hearing: 25th November ;1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Appointment of respondents to specified post was earlier than that of appellant civil servant and deficiency of academic qualification of respondents was impliedly relaxed by excluding such cases from scrutiny-- Respondents' appointment thus, stood regularised by the competent Authority, entitling them to reckon their regular service from the date they were actually appointed
Respondents having been rightly given due position in the seniority list, appellant civil servant had no case to contest with their seniority. Hafiz-SA. Rehman, Standing Counsel for the Government. Respondents Nos. 3 to 7 and 10 in person. Respondents Nos. 8 and 9 absent.
Judgment & Decree
Appointment of respondents to specified post was earlier than that of appellant civil servant and deficiency of academic qualification of respondents was impliedly relaxed by excluding such cases from scrutiny-- Respondents' appointment thus, stood regularised by the competent Authority, entitling them to reckon their regular service from the date they were actually appointed
Respondents having been rightly given due position in the seniority list, appellant civil servant had no case to contest with their seniority. Raja Muhammad Asghar Khan for Appellant. Hafiz-SA. Rehman, Standing Counsel for the Government. Respondents Nos. 3 to 7 and 10 in person. Respondents Nos. 8 and 9 absent. Date of hearing: 25th November ;1991.