2020 PLP 359 (SCMR)
Sheikh IQBAL AZAM FAROOQUI through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Chairman NAB — Respondent
| Citation | 2020 PLP 359 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Mushir Alam, Sajjad Ali Shah and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ |
| Parties | Sheikh IQBAL AZAM FAROOQUI through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Chairman NAB — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2020 PLP 359 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2020 PLP 359 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mushir Alam, Sajjad Ali Shah and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2020 PLP 359 (SCMR) (Sheikh IQBAL AZAM FAROOQUI through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Chairman NAB — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Amir Raza Naqvi, Advocate Supreme Court and Ghulam Rasool Mangi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against order dated 21.3.2019 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi passed in Cr. Accountability Appeal No.14/2013)
S. 431
Scope
Sentence and fine imposed by Trial Court
Appeal against conviction filed before the High Court
Convict expiring during pendency of his appeal
Question whether appeal required adjudication on merits after death of convict
Held, that corporal consequences of a conviction withered away with the death of the convict, therefore appeal filed by the convict would automatically abate, as the death severed all temporal links with his corpus
However, financial liability or fine, consequent upon conviction, which shifted upon the estate of deceased-convict, would certainly require the appellate court to decide the appeal on its own merit as in the event of its failure, the liability was to be exacted from the assets devolving upon the legal heirs. Sattar Awan, Special Prosecutor for the State.
Judgment & Decree
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.
Sheikh Iqbal Azam Farooqui, since demised, was tried by an Accountability Court at Karachi; he was arrayed in the reference alongside Javed Iqbal Farooqui, Iftikhar A. Shaikh and Shaikh Mansoor Ahmed, away from law till date, proceeded accordingly; held guilty under section 9(a)(viii) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with a direction to pay Rs. 5.187 million as fine, to be recovered as arrears of land revenue; upon his death, a learned Division Bench of High Court of Sindh, disposed of his appeal as having been abated, while keeping amount of fine intact to be realized from his estate vide impugned order dated 21.3.2019, vires whereof are being disputed herein.
2. Learned counsel for the legal heirs of the deceased convict contends that notwithstanding death of the convict, his appeal, admitted to regular hearing during his life time, merited full dress regular adjudication as not only his name required vindication but also for the additional reason that his estate, devolving upon the legal heirs, was burdened with impugned conviction. While referring to the provisions of section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, law declared by this Court in the cases of Dr. Ghulam Hussain (represented by 8 heirs) v. The State (1971 SCMR 35) and Muhammad Shamoon (deceased) through legal representatives v. The State and another (2019 SCMR 1144) has been referred to argue that there was no occasion for the learned High Court to short circuit the pending proceedings with fiscal consequences of the conviction still impinging upon the estate. The learned Law Officer has contested the motion.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. Corporal consequences of a conviction wither away with the death of the convict, therefore appeal filed by the convict would automatically abate, as the death severs all temporal links with his corpus. However, financial liability, consequent upon conviction and shifted upon the estate, would certainly require the appellate court to decide the appeal on its own merit as in the event of its failure, the liability is to be exacted from the assets devolving upon the legal heirs. A plain reading of section 431 of the Code ibid confirms the above contemplation of law. Criminal petition is converted into appeal; allowed. The impugned order is set aside. Appeal filed by the deceased, being sustained by his legal heirs, shall be deemed as pending before the High Court for adjudication on merits. MWA/I-1/SC Petition allowed.