2003 PLP 288 (PTD)
Ch. ALLAH RAKHA Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
| Citation | 2003 PLP 288 (PTD) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Tax Ombudsman |
| Bench Members | Justice (Retd.) Saleem Akhtar, Federal Tax Ombudsman |
| Parties | Ch. ALLAH RAKHA Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 288 (PTD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 288 (PTD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Tax Ombudsman bench comprising: Justice (Retd.) Saleem Akhtar, Federal Tax Ombudsman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 288 (PTD) (Ch. ALLAH RAKHA Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.10(10)‑‑‑Procedure and evidence‑‑‑Issue decided by the President of Pakistan‑‑‑Same relief was claimed in complaint‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Issue having been decided a‑ the level of President of Pakistan could not be reconsidered at any forum‑‑‑No further investigation was warranted‑‑ Federal Tax' Ombudsman closed the file under S.10(10) of the Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000.
Judgment & Decree
The applicant seeks recommendation to C.B.R. to pay him Rs.146,000 on account of loss caused to him by retaining his books of account for an unwarranted period. Brief facts are that the applicant had earlier approached Wafaqi Mohtasib with the same request that was turned down. He approached the President thereafter for the same relief as prayed in this application. President's Secretariat directed C.B.R. to pay Rs.50,000 to the applicant on account of delayed return of books of accounts which has been paid. The issue having been decided at the level of President, cannot be re‑considered at any forum. No further investigation is warranted. The file is closed under section 10(10) of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000. C.M.A./466/FTO Order accordingly.