MLD 2022

2022 PLP 1002 (MLD)

BISMILLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Decided Date
2021-December-4
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2022 PLP 1002 (MLD)
Forum / Court Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties BISMILLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2022 PLP 1002 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2022 PLP 1002 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2022 PLP 1002 (MLD) (BISMILLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ali Haider and Usama Zubairi for Petitioner.
  • 3. After hearing the learned counsel for petitioner/convict the learned DAG assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant on Video Link Form Gilgit in GB Chief Court Skardu Registry and perusing the record it is observed that the petitioner appellant was convicted and sentenced as above. The court has to be closed from 15th December on wards for two months on account of winter vacations and tour of bench to Skardu Registry is not expected till the month of March 2022, hence there is no chance of fixation of main Revision petition of Petitioner/convict in near future. The petitioner remained on bail during his trial and there is no allegation that he misused the concession of bail during his trial of case. Since the sentence awarded to the petitioner is short one, therefore, chances, cannot be ruled out that the main revision/appeal of the petitioner couldn't be heard till the period of coming six months, if it happened so, then under section 426 [1-A](a), Cr.P.C., the petitioner/convict would be entitled for bail on the basis of lapse of statutory period of six months, which is envisaged in the above mentioned provision.

Headnotes / Summary

S.426

Suspension of sentence, pending appeal

Scope

Accused sought suspension of his sentence

Court had to be closed for a period of two months on account of winter vacations, hence, there was no chance of fixation of main petition in near future

Accused had remained on bail during his trial and there was no allegation that he had misused the concession of bail during his trial

Since the sentence awarded to the accused was short one, therefore, chances could not be ruled out that the main revision of the accused could not be heard till the period of coming six months

If it happened so, then under S.426(1-A)(a), Cr.P.C., the accused would be entitled for bail on lapse of statutory period of six months

Petition was allowed, sentence awarded to the accused was suspended and he was ordered to be released on bail.

Judgment & Decree

RAJA SHAKEEL AHMED, J.

Through above titled petition the conviction/petitioners assailed the impugned judgment dated 5-5-2021 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Skardu and order dated 17-12-2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge Skardu, wherein the learned Sessions Judge maintained conviction and sentences awarded by the trial Court and dismissed the appeal of convict/appellant holding devoid of merit. Along with the above Cr. Rev the petitioner/convict also submitted Cr. Misc. No. 10/21 under section 426, Cr.P.C.

2. Through Cr. Misc. No. 10/21 under section 426, Cr.P.C, Bismillah Khan convict/petitioner seeks suspension of the sentence in case FIR No.30/2017 dated 18/05/2017 offence under section 380/457, P.P.C. registered at Police Station City Skardu vide judgment dated 17/11/2021 wherein the learned Sessions Judge maintained conviction and sentences awarded by the trial Court and dismissed the appeal of convict/appellant holding devoid of merit. Whereas the learned trial Court after trial on merit vide its judgement dated 05/05/2021, had convicted the accused/petitioner and sentenced him as under. "In view of above discussion it is held that prosecution has succeeded to establish the charges under sections 380 and 457, P.P.C. against the accused Bismillah Khan, who is convicted accordingly and sentenced to undergo three years' simple imprisonment with fine of Rs. I0,000/under section 380, P.P.C. and to undergo two years S.I with fine of Rs.5000 under section 457, P.P.C. respectively."

3. After hearing the learned counsel for petitioner/convict the learned DAG assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant on Video Link Form Gilgit in GB Chief Court Skardu Registry and perusing the record it is observed that the petitioner appellant was convicted and sentenced as above. The court has to be closed from 15th December on wards for two months on account of winter vacations and tour of bench to Skardu Registry is not expected till the month of March 2022, hence there is no chance of fixation of main Revision petition of Petitioner/convict in near future. The petitioner remained on bail during his trial and there is no allegation that he misused the concession of bail during his trial of case. Since the sentence awarded to the petitioner is short one, therefore, chances, cannot be ruled out that the main revision/appeal of the petitioner couldn't be heard till the period of coming six months, if it happened so, then under section 426 [1-A](a), Cr.P.C., the petitioner/convict would be entitled for bail on the basis of lapse of statutory period of six months, which is envisaged in the above mentioned provision.

4. Resultantly, the instant petition is allowed the sentence awarded to the petitioner/convict Bismillah Khan is suspended and he is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lac) with- two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Registrar Judicial of this Court (Skardu Registry). Petitioner shall appear before this court in each and every date of hearing till the final decision of main Cr. Revision No.04/21, the Criminal Miscellaneous No.10/21 is disposed of accordingly. File. SA/16/GB Sentence suspended.