2007 P Cr (PLP)
NASEER AHMAD alias NASRI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | NASEER AHMAD alias NASRI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 P Cr (PLP) (NASEER AHMAD alias NASRI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Yousaf for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 148 & 149
Accused was nominated in F.I.R. with specific role of causing fire-arm injuries to injured
Medico-legal Report of injured had revealed that injured had three fire-arm injuries on his person as narrated in the F.I.R. and the duration of those injuries also tallied with the time of occurrence
Accused though had also received injuries during the occurrence, but those injuries established his presence at the spot as well as his participation in the occurrence
Accused was very much required by the agency for further investigation, who had already been declared as proclaimed offender
No ground for grant of bail having been made out, bail application was dismissed with the direction to agency to bring on record cross-version of accused as well and proceed with the matter strictly in accordance with law
Ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused stood withdrawn.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN MUHAMMAD NAJAM-UZ-ZAMAN, J.
Seeks pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.447 of 2005 for the offence under sections 324/148/149, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Lundianwala, District Faisalabad.
2. Precise allegation against the petitioner is that at the relevant time he was armed with repeater (gun), whereas his co-accused were also armed with different kind of fire-arms and Sotas etc. in furtherance of their common intention while forming an unlawful assembly launched an attack and made indiscriminate firing. Allegedly the fire made by the petitioner hit Najum-ul-Hassan on the right thigh near the knee, on the shin and on the back of the right leg. Bail application of the petitioner was-dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Jaranwala vide order, dated 2-5-2006, hence this petition.
3. Bail is sought on the grounds that during this occurrence petitioner also received multiple injuries and the complainant party with the connivance of the police while distorting the facts got registered the present case showing that the petitioner party was the aggressor. Further submits that cross-version of the case was also brought on the record but with the mala fide intention the same has been removed from the file of this case. It is submitted that it was the complainant party which had aggressed. Submits that petitioner never caused any injury to Najum-ul-Hassan (P.W.) and the injuries were manufactured later on just to falsely involve the petitioner and his co-accused in this case. It is further submitted that it was a night time occurrence and the identification of the assailants was not possible. Lastly argued that in the circumstances petitioner is entitled to the concession of pre-arrest bail. Conversely counsel for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with the specific role of causing of fire-arm injuries to Najum-ul-Hassan. The medico-legal report of Najum-ul-Hassan reveals that he had three fire-arm injuries on his person as narrated in the, F.I.R. and the duration of these injuries also tallies with the time of occurrence. No doubt, as it is apparent from the record that petitioner had also received injuries during the occurrence but these injuries establish his presence at the spot .as well as his participation in the occurrence. Petitioner is very much required by the agency for further investigation who has already been declared as proclaimed offender. No ground for bail is made out. This petition stands dismissed with the direction to the agency to bring on record the cross-version of the petitioner as well and proceed with the matter strictly in accordance with law, Ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner vide order, dated 7-7-2006 stands withdrawn. H.B.T./N-111/L Bail refused.