P L D 1961 W (PLP)
Appellant Versus THE R. T. A., R ALPINDI AND OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1961 W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue, |
| Parties | Appellant Versus THE R. T. A., R ALPINDI AND OTHERS‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1961 W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1961 W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1961 W (PLP) (Appellant Versus THE R. T. A., R ALPINDI AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nisar Ahmad for Appellant. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Rawalpindi. .
Headnotes / Summary
Route permit‑Condition that vehicles of 1954 and earlier snake would not ply on Rawalpindi‑Murree Route‑To apply to existing permit‑holders, as soon as their permits of earlier make vehicles expire.
Judgment & Decree
THE R. T. A., R ALPINDI AND OTHERS‑Respondents Appellate Side No. 165 of 1958‑59, decided on 10th March, 1961, District Rawalpindi. Route permit‑Condition that vehicles of 1954 and earlier snake would not ply on Rawalpindi‑Murree Route‑To apply to existing permit‑holders, as soon as their permits of earlier make vehicles expire. Nisar Ahmad for Appellant. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Rawalpindi. . Mr. Nisar Ahmad, Advocate, states that this appeal has become in fructuous in view of my decision in Transport Appeal No. 141 of 1958‑59 by which 1 had held that Rawalpindi‑Murree was not monopoly route and the Regional Transport Authority should carry out a survey of the existing requirements so as to decide what should be the increase in the number of permits for this route and then to grant additional permits. Mr. Nisar Ahmad contended that the Regional Transport Authority have laid down a condition that vehicles of 1954 and earlier make will not be allowed to ply on this route and that this condition is not made applicable to the existing permit‑holders. Secretary, Regional Se, Transport Authority asserts that this condition would apply equally to all permit‑holders and in this case of the existing permit holders the condition would be enforced as soon as their permits of earlier make vehicles expire. The appeal is accordingly. K. M. A. Appeal dismissed.